Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36654973›Full record

ArticleTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2022

Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Blood Donors with Negative ID-NAT in Switzerland.

Andrea Zbinden, Judith Ries, Patrick M Redli, Cyril Shah, Andreas Glauser, David Goslings, Daniela Huzly, Jürg Böni, Jochen Gottschalk, Beat M Frey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advancing blood transfusion safety using molecular detection in the country of Georgia.Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea ZbindenInstitute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Judith RiesBlood Transfusion Service SRC Zurich, Swiss Red Cross, Zürich, Switzerland.
Patrick M RedliInstitute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cyril ShahInstitute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas GlauserBlood Transfusion Service SRC Zurich, Swiss Red Cross, Zürich, Switzerland.
David GoslingsBlood Transfusion Service SRC Zurich, Swiss Red Cross, Zürich, Switzerland.
Daniela HuzlyInstitute of Virology, Department for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Jürg BöniInstitute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jochen GottschalkBlood Transfusion Service SRC Zurich, Swiss Red Cross, Zürich, Switzerland.
Beat M FreyBlood Transfusion Service SRC Zurich, Swiss Red Cross, Zürich, Switzerland.
Swiss Red Cross · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Screening of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and individual-donation nucleic acid amplification testing (ID-NAT) of blood donors have become standard to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, there is still a residual risk of HBV transmission by blood components of donors suffering from occult HBV infection (OBI). Therefore, many countries implemented universal testing of anti-HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) antibodies in order to increase blood safety. In Switzerland, anti-HBc testing is not part of the routine blood donor-screening repertoire. Therefore, we sought to assess prevalence of donors with OBI in a Swiss blood donor collective. Methods: Blood donations were prospectively investigated for the presence of anti-HBc antibodies during two time periods (I: all donors, March 2017; II: first-time donors only, April 2017 until February 2018). Anti-HBc-positive findings were confirmed by an anti-HBc neutralization test. Discarded plasma samples of anti-HBc-confirmed positive donors were ultracentrifuged and subsequently retested by regular HBV-ID-NAT to search for traces of HBV. Results: During time period I, 78 (1.6%) individuals out of 4,923 donors were confirmed anti-HBc-positive. Sixty-nine (88%) anti-HBc-positive samples were available and processed by ultracentrifugation followed by repeat HBV-ID-NAT. Four samples (5.8%) were found positive for HBV DNA. Sixty-five (94.2%) samples remained HBV NAT-negative upon ultracentrifugation. During time period II, 56 (0.9%) donor samples out of 6,509 exhibited anti-HBc-confirmed positive. Fifty-five (98%) samples could be reassessed by HBV-ID-NAT upon ultracentrifugation. Three (5.5%) samples contained HBV DNA and 52 (94.5%) samples remained HBV NAT-negative. Conclusion: Overall, we detected 7 viremic OBI carriers among 11,432 blood donors, which tested negative for HBV by standard HBV-ID-NAT and HBsAg screening. In contrast, OBI carriers showed positive anti-HBc findings which could be confirmed in 83.8% of the cases. Thus, OBI might be missed by the current HBV screening process of Swiss blood donors. We suggest to review current HBV screening algorithm. Extended donor screening by anti-HBc testing may unmask OBI carriers and contribute to blood safety for the recipient of blood products.

Indexed as

Anti-HBc screeningBlood donorsHBV-ID-NATOccult hepatitis B virus infection

Identifiers

PMID36654973
PMCPMC9768291
OpenAlexW4286633630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.