Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2022
Defining Soft Tissue: Bitmap Printing of Soft Tissue for Surgical Planning.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digitized Precision Corrective Osteotomy for Treating Knee Joint Deformities: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Review
- 3D printing for an anterolateral thigh phalloplasty.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
- The Inner Complexities of Multimodal Medical Data: Bitmap-Based 3D Printing for Surgical Planning Using Dynamic Physiology.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Defining Soft Tissue: Bitmap Printing of Soft Tissue for Surgical Planning.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nearly all applications of 3D printing for surgical planning have been limited to bony structures and simple morphological descriptions of complex organs due to the fundamental limitations in accuracy, quality, and efficiency of the current modeling paradigms and technologies. Current approaches have largely ignored the constitution of soft tissue critical to most surgical specialties where multiple high-resolution variations transition gradually across the interior of the volume. Differences in the scales of organization related to unique organs require special attention to capture fine features critical to surgical procedures. We present a six-material bitmap printing technique for creating 3D models directly from medical images, which are superior in spatial and contrast resolution to current 3D modeling methods, and contain previously unachievable spatial fidelity for soft tissue differentiation. A retrospective exempt IRB was obtained for all data through the Colorado Multiple Institution Review Board #21-3128.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.