Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2021
Additive Manufacturing for Automotive Applications: Mechanical and Weathering Durability of Vat Photopolymerization Materials.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the effect of the post-curing process as well as the long-term weathering behavior were studied for three different three-dimensional printable, pigmented (black), nonstabilized, ultraviolet (UV) cure resin formulations (A and B being thiol-ene chemistry, and C being acrylate chemistry). To study the effect of the post-cure process, the printed parts were post-cured using one of five different processes: no post-cure, UV-only, heat-only, UV+heat, and electron beam (EB) post-curing. Bulk tensile properties and nanohardness were measured for each of the systems and post-cure conditions. For weathering studies, the parts were post-cured using the recommended UV-only process and exposed using the ASTM D7869 exterior weathering protocol. The results show that the post-cure process had a significant effect on the final mechanical properties of the resins and was dependent on the underlying resin chemistry. Thermal post-curing was not as effective as UV curing for Resin C compared with the two other resins, which could both undergo thermal polymerization. In addition, Resin B showed the smallest change in mechanical properties before and after post-curing, regardless of the type of post-curing process. EB post-curing, even at very low dosages, that is, from 0.05 to 1 Mrad, resulted in considerable post-cure cross-linking to the point of embrittlement and a significant drop in percent elongation at break for dosages above 0.5 Mrad. Although Resins A and C outperformed Resin B in photooxidation performance, all three resins demonstrated that promising results considering no hindered amine light stabilizers were used in the formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.