Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2020
Three-Dimensional-Printed Shape Memory Biomass Composites for Thermal-Responsive Devices.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Nanocomposite Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, unique three-dimensional (3D)-printed shape memory biomass composites were prepared by the melt blending and extrusion of polyurethane, polycaprolactone (PCL), and wood flour (WF) with adjustable contents. The addition content of PCL was used to adjust the shape memory transition temperature and improve the shape fixing rate of composites. The crystallization, thermal, mechanical, and shape memory properties of different composites were investigated. The results of X-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry tests showed that the crystallization peak and melting temperature of different composites were not obviously changed. As the PCL content increased, the tensile strength of the composites decreased first and then increased, and the elongation at break gradually decreased. Thermal response shape memory test results showed that, when the PCL content was 30 wt.%, the composites had high shape recovery rate and fixed rate (both ∼100%). In addition, carbon black (CB) was added as a photothermal conversion material to the composite with a preferred ratio to achieve the photothermal response shape memory performance. With the addition of CB, the thermal conductivity of composites was improved. Under the same conditions, the thicker the 3D-printed specimens, the longer the specimen shape recovery time; the greater the light intensity, the shorter the specimen shape recovery time. Compared with the composite without CB, the flower model printed with the composites containing CB had a better photothermal response shape memory performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.