ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2023
Clinical Profile, Practice Pattern, and Outcomes With First-Line Therapy in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer: Real-World Data From Resource-Constrained Settings.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustained Complete Response to Brigatinib in a Young Patient With ALK-Positive NSCLC Harboring I1171N Mutation Post-Alectinib Resistance.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2026Article
- A Decade of Treating ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Lower Middle-Income Country: Changing Patterns and Improving Survival.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
- Uniqueness of lung cancer in Southeast Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Review
- Lorlatinib in the second line and beyond for ALK positive lung cancer: real-world data from resource-constrained settings.BJC reports · 2024Article
- Case report: ALK D1225N missense mutation in lung adenocarcinoma responds to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: ALK inhibitors are one of the success stories in precision medicine for treating patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, developing countries have substantial constraints in using ALK inhibitors, with limited data from India. Methods: An audit of a prospectively collected database of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated from January 2013 to March 2018 was conducted. The SPSS version 20.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 441 patients were available for analysis; 62.5% were males, median age was 50 (range: 19-75) years, and 78.3% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. When all the lines of therapies were included in the analysis, ALK inhibitors could be used in 379 (85.9%) of the total ALK-positive patients and 292 patients (66.2%) received ALK inhibitors in the first line in any strategy. The major reason for not starting ALK inhibitors upfront was financial constraints in 69% of the patients. The median progression-free survival on first-line therapy for the entire cohort was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2-15.9), with a significant difference between patients receiving ALK inhibitor in first line in any strategy versus not in first line (17.2 mo [95% CI: 14.5-19.9] versus 5.9 mo [95% CI: 4.2-7.6], Conclusions: Most of our patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were exposed to ALK inhibitors through various support mechanisms. Those patients who could receive ALK inhibitors in the first line had a significant survival advantage as compared with others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.