Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36654872›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

The impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes in paediatric emergency departments and primary care: a systematic review.

Giulia Brigadoi, Sara Rossin, Davide Visentin, Elisa Barbieri, Carlo Giaquinto, Liviana Da Dalt, Daniele Donà

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giulia BrigadoiPaediatric Emergency Department, Department of Woman's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sara RossinPaediatric Emergency Department, Department of Woman's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Davide VisentinDepartment of Woman's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Elisa BarbieriDivision of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Woman's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Carlo GiaquintoDivision of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Woman's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Liviana Da DaltPaediatric Emergency Department, Department of Woman's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Daniele DonàDivision of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Woman's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiani 3, 35141 Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7105-2105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antibiotics remain the most prescribed medicine in children worldwide, but half of the prescriptions are unnecessary or inappropriate, leading to an increase in antibiotic resistance. This study aims to systemically review the effects of different Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes (ASPs) on reducing the rates of both antibiotic prescriptions and changes in antimicrobial resistance, and on the economic impact in paediatric emergency departments (PED) and primary care settings. Materials and methods: Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched, combining Medical Subject Heading and free-text terms for 'children' and 'antimicrobial' and 'stewardship'. The search strategy involved restrictions on dates (from 1 January 2007 to 30 December 2020) but not on language. Randomized controlled trials, controlled and non-controlled before and after studies, controlled and non-controlled interrupted time series, and cohort studies were included for review. The review protocol was registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: Registration Number CRD42021270630. Results: Of the 47,158 articles that remained after removing duplicates, 59 were eligible for inclusion. Most of the studies were published after 2015 (37/59, 62.7%) and in high-income countries (51/59, 86.4%). Almost half of the studies described the implementation of an ASP in the primary care setting (28/59, 47.5%), while 15 manuscripts described the implementation of ASPs in EDs (15/59, 25.4%). More than half of the studies (43/59, 72.9%) described the implementation of multiple interventions, whereas few studies considered the implementation of a single intervention. Antibiotic prescriptions and compliance with guidelines were the most frequent outcomes (47/59, 79.7% and 20/59, 33.9%, respectively). Most of the articles reported an improvement in these outcomes after implementing an ASP. Meanwhile, only very few studies focused on health care costs (6/59, 10.2%) and antimicrobial resistance (3/59 5.1%). Conclusion: The implementation of ASPs has been proven to be feasible and valuable, even in challenging settings such as Emergency Departments and Primary care.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistanteantimicrobial Stewardship programspediatric emergency department

Identifiers

PMID36654872
PMCPMC9841878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.