Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2021
Production and Characterization of Poly (Lactic Acid)/Nanostructured Carboapatite for 3D Printing of Bioactive Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Build Orientation on Mode III Fracture Load of Additively Manufactured Polylactic Acid Material.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2026Article
- In-House 3D-Printed Surgical Guides with a Minimally Invasive Design for Asymmetric Mentoplasty: A Case Series.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Review
- A Synergic Strategy: Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Spheroids Seeded on 3D-Printed PLA/CHA Scaffolds Implanted in a Bone Critical-Size Defect Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biocompatible scaffolds are porous matrices that are bone substitutes with great potential in tissue regeneration. For this, these scaffolds need to have bioactivity and biodegradability. From this perspective, 3D printing presents itself as one of the techniques with the greatest potential for scaffold manufacturing with porosity and established structure, based on 3D digital modeling. Thus, the objective of the present work was to produce 3D scaffolds from the poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and the nanostructured hydroxyapatite doped with carbonate ions (CHA). For this purpose, filaments were produced via fusion for the fused-filament 3D printing and used to produce scaffolds with 50% porosity in the cubic shape and 0/90°configuration. The dispersive energy spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis demonstrated the presence of CHA in the polymeric matrix, confirming the presence and incorporation into the composite. The thermogravimetric analysis made it possible to determine that the filler concentration incorporated in the matrix was very similar to the proposed percentage, indicating that there were no major losses in the process of obtaining the filaments. It can be assumed that the influence of CHA as a filler presents better mechanical properties up to a certain amount. The biological results point to a great potential for the application of PLA/CHA scaffolds in bone tissue engineering with effective cell adhesion, proliferation, biocompatibility, and no cytotoxicity effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.