Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36654817›Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2022

Artificial intelligence in breast cancer imaging: risk stratification, lesion detection and classification, treatment planning and prognosis-a narrative review.

Maurizio Cè, Elena Caloro, Maria E Pellegrino, Mariachiara Basile, Adriana Sorce, Deborah Fazzini, Giancarlo Oliva, Michaela Cellina

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Challenges and Opportunities.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maurizio CèPostgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8906-5665
Elena CaloroPostgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Maria E PellegrinoPostgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Mariachiara BasilePostgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Adriana SorcePostgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Deborah FazziniCentro Diagnostico Italiano, 20147 Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo OlivaDepartment of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20121 Milan, Italy.
Michaela CellinaDepartment of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20121 Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITCentro Diagnostico Italiano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a real game changer in today's landscape of breast cancer imaging. Several innovative AI-based tools have been developed and validated in recent years that promise to accelerate the goal of real patient-tailored management. Numerous studies confirm that proper integration of AI into existing clinical workflows could bring significant benefits to women, radiologists, and healthcare systems. The AI-based approach has proved particularly useful for developing new risk prediction models that integrate multi-data streams for planning individualized screening protocols. Furthermore, AI models could help radiologists in the pre-screening and lesion detection phase, increasing diagnostic accuracy, while reducing workload and complications related to overdiagnosis. Radiomics and radiogenomics approaches could extrapolate the so-called imaging signature of the tumor to plan a targeted treatment. The main challenges to the development of AI tools are the huge amounts of high-quality data required to train and validate these models and the need for a multidisciplinary team with solid machine-learning skills. The purpose of this article is to present a summary of the most important AI applications in breast cancer imaging, analyzing possible challenges and new perspectives related to the widespread adoption of these new tools.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBreast cancer imagingcomputer-aided detectiondigital breast tomosynthesismachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmammogram

Identifiers

PMID36654817
PMCPMC9834285
OpenAlexW4312200733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.