Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36654787›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical mycology2022

Post-antifungal effect of the combination of anidulafungin with amphotericin B and fluconazole against fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant

Narges Vaseghi, Majid Piramoon, Shaghayegh Khojasteh, Kiana Abbasi, Sahar Mohseni, Javad Javidnia, Behrooz Naghili, Narges Aslani

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical mycology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Design, Spectral Insights, and Enhanced Antioxidant Potential of Novel Phenothiazine DerivativesAnti-inflammatory & anti-allergy agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Narges VaseghiDepartment of Pathobiology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Majid PiramoonDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Radiopharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Shaghayegh KhojastehInvasive Fungi Research Center, Communicable Diseases Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Kiana AbbasiDepartment of Microbiology, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran.
Sahar MohseniDepartment of Microbiology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran.
Javad JavidniaDepartment of Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Mazandaran, Sari, Iran.
Behrooz NaghiliInfectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Narges AslaniInfectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University of Zanjan · IRIslamic Azad University Sari Branch · IRIslamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch · IRLorestan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Invasive candidiasis is a life-threatening condition that kills a large number of immunocompromised patients each year worldwide. We used post-antifungal effect studies to analyze the activities of anidulafungin (AFG), as a clinically crucial antifungal drug, amphotericin B (AMB), and fluconazole (alone and in combinations) against FLC-susceptible and -resistant Materials and Methods: We tested the phenomenon of post antifungal effects of FLC, AMB, AFG, and combinations of FLC+AFG, AFG+AMB, and FLC+AMB against 17 Results: The FLC had no detectable post-antifungal effect independent of antifungal concentration and resembled drug-free FLC (control). Significant variations in the post-antifungal effect were observed when all AMB and AFG were compared to FLC. The combination of AFG and AMB with FLC resulted in effective activity compared to FLC alone. Combination regimens were rated as indifferent in general. Interestingly, low dosages of the AFG displayed increasing fungistatic action as it approached a fungistatic endpoint against Conclusion: Our findings suggested that brief exposure to AFG, in combination with FLC and AMB, at low concentrations of the medicines utilized, could be effective in the evaluation and optimization of new dosage regimens to manage candidiasis. However, future studies will determine the clinical utility of our findings.

Indexed as

AnidulafunginCandida albicansCombination regimenPost-antifungal effect

Identifiers

PMID36654787
PMCPMC9825794
OpenAlexW4312766539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.