Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36654729›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023

Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Planning and improving outcomes: Case series and literature review.

S Ali Ghasemi, Benjamin C Murray, Joshua R Buksbaum, Jonggu Shin, Austin Fragomen, S Robert Rozbruch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.JBJS essential surgical techniques
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S Ali GhasemiOrthopaedic Surgery, Albert Einstein Health Network, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, United States.
Benjamin C MurrayPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19131, United States.
Joshua R BuksbaumLimb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Weill Cornell Medical College Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery New York, NY, 10021, United States.
Jonggu ShinLimb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Weill Cornell Medical College Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery New York, NY, 10021, United States.
Austin FragomenLimb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Weill Cornell Medical College Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery New York, NY, 10021, United States.
S Robert RozbruchLimb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Weill Cornell Medical College Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery New York, NY, 10021, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a safe surgical procedure to treat medial compartmental osteoarthritis caused by a varus deformity. Over-correction of this varus deformity can lead to lateral compartment over-loading. In our study, we planned our correction by using the mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of OWHTO based on planning using the MAD measurements. Study Design: Retrospective Case Series. Methods: 14 patients with Kellgren- Lawrence classification (KL) grade 3 or above underwent OWHTO, with plans to have the mechanical axis pass through 5-15 mm lateral to the center of the tibial plateau. Pre-operative and post-operative radiographic measurements were made and compared using the student t-test. SF-36 scores were obtained for clinical performance. Results: Our patients experienced MAD from 25.9 mm medial to the center of the tibial plateau pre-operatively to 12.7 mm lateral to the center of the plateau post-operatively. The mean change in MAD was 38.7 mm (p < 0.0001). The accuracy of our correction compared to the planned MAD was 98.3%. The mechanical axis angle shifted from 7.35° of varus to 3.5° of valgus (p < 0.0001). All patients had post-operative alignments of 1-6° of valgus, with 11 of out the 14 patients with alignments less than 5° of valgus, preventing over-loading of the lateral compartment. Conclusion: Using MAD measurements is an accurate planning method for OWHTO that corrects varus deformity without over-loading the lateral compartment, and leads to improved clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

High tibial osteotomyKnee osteoarthritisMAD, mechanical axis deviationOpening wedgeOWHTO, opening wedge high tibial osteotomyUni-compartmental osteoarthritisVarus deformity

Identifiers

PMID36654729
PMCPMC9840976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.