ArticleCureus2022
Role of 3D Printing in Post-op Rehabilitation of Palatal Bone Loss by Mucormycosis: A Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThree dimensions (3D) modeling, printing, and manufacturing can help in personalized and customized surgical reconstruction of complex defects in the craniofacial region with precision by manipulating tissues based on the preoperative assessment, planning the shape of metal and alloplastic materials, and reduction in the total cost and time of the surgery.
aimThe present survey study aimed to assess the approach of treating surgeons towards the role of 3D printing in post-op rehabilitation of palatal bone loss by mucormycosis.
methodsOne thousand eyes nose and throat (ENT) and maxillofacial surgeons were given a pre-formed structured survey questionnaire to be filled by subjects themselves for their view on the role of 3D printing for rehabilitation and reconstruction of palatal bone loss due to mucormycosis.
resultsEfficacy of 3D printing to print the pneumatic sinus design and palatal contour helping to design accurate support with a lightweight prosthesis, 67.2% (n=672) subjects whereas, exact duplication of the excised tissue, 85.4% (n=854) subjects, to detect and duplicate undercuts, 58.4% (n=584) subjects, 3D printing can be helpful as the proper extension of impression 73.2% (n=732) subjects responded positively. For reconstruction of a lost palate by prosthesis 91.2% (n=912) of study participants, in making obturators using Titanium framework and Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) was given a positive response by 82.2% (n=822) subjects, to fabricate prosthesis obturator required in palatal perforation in case of mucormycosis was given a positive response by 88.1% (n=881) subjects, the role of 3D printing to overlay zygomatic implant prosthesis was responded positively by 68.9% (n=689) study subjects.
conclusionThe present survey study concludes that 3D printing is a reliable and accurate method for palatal reconstruction following bone destruction by mucormycosis as reported by the majority of ENT and maxillofacial surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.