Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36654646›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Spontaneous Retroperitoneal Hematoma: A Deadly Complication for Patients Awaiting Liver Transplant.

Badi Rawashdeh, Joohyun Kim, Johnny Hong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Badi RawashdehTransplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Joohyun KimTransplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Johnny HongTransplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Medical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are at increased risk for hemorrhage and spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma (sRPH) and also carry a high mortality rate. We sought to review the natural history of sRPH in patients with ESLD at a single center.

methodsAll patients admitted to a single transplantation intensive care unit (TICU) at Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin Transplant Center between June 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Six ESLD patients with sRPH were studied. Clinical outcome measures were liver disease severity, sRPH treatment, and patient survival.

resultsSix patients were included, four male and two female patients, with a median age of 56.5 years (range 30-67 years). All had alcohol-induced liver cirrhosis. The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the time of sRPH diagnosis was 40 (range 30-43). The most commonly identified source of bleeding was from lumbar arteries. One patient had recurrent bleeding after embolization and underwent repeat embolization. Five patients died. The median time to death from the diagnosis of sRPH was 7.2 days (range 2-12 days). The patient who survived following embolization had the lowest MELD score.

conclusionCritically ill cirrhotic patients with sRPH have a significant mortality rate. Embolization is successful, albeit seldom. This is the largest retrospective series of sRPH in cirrhotic patients in the literature.

Indexed as

critical careend stage liver diseaseid critical careinterventional radiologyliver transplantspontaneous bleeding

Identifiers

PMID36654646
PMCPMC9838682
OpenAlexW4311472527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.