ArticleCureus2022
Mothers' Impressions and Beliefs About Taking a Booster Dose for COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy and Lactation.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hesitancy toward vaccination against COVID-19: A scoping review of prevalence and associated factors in the Arab world.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to explore perceptions and willingness to get coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccination among pregnant and lactating women in Jordan.
methodsA cross-sectional study using a 29-item web-based questionnaire was conducted. Sociodemographic characteristics, vaccine acceptance, confidence in the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine, perception of risk for COVID-19, and acceptance to participate in COVID-19 booster vaccine clinical trials were prospectively evaluated. Logistic regression was used to identify factors that might affect the participants' acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine and their willingness to enroll in clinical trials of a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
resultsAmong all participants (pregnant and lactating women, n = 584), 328 (56.2%) intended to receive the booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Predictors of booster dose acceptance were a medical-related degree (OR 1.62, CI 1.06-2.5, p = 0.028), income (OR 0.677, CI 0.52-0.88, p = 0.004), living residency (OR 0.44, CI 0.32-0.60, p < 0.001), knowing pregnant/lactating women previously infected with infectious microbe (OR 1.539, CI 1.07-2.23, p = 0.022), commitment to immunization for children (OR 3.01, CI 1.03-8.82, p = 0.044), receiving an influenza vaccine (OR 1.46, CI 1.04-2.05, p = 0.031), and worried about infectious microbes (OR 1.32, CI 1.15-1.52, p < 0.001). Among participants, only 22.9% were willing to participate in clinical trials of the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine. The biggest motivator for participation was the participants' desire to help find the best vaccine during pregnancy/lactation (57.5%) while the main barrier towards participation was not wanting to expose themselves and their babies to more side effects (88.0%).
conclusionThis study reported reasonable acceptance of vaccination in a sample of pregnant/lactating women. Vaccination hesitancy for the booster dose was in-line with similar studies on the primary series around the globe, but the willingness to participate in clinical trials was lower than non-pregnant/non-lactating women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.