ReviewCureus2022
Management of Lateral Epicondylitis Using Transdermal Nitroglycerin: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lateral and Medial Elbow Tendinopathy and Previous Injuries to Adjacent Joints: A Multicenter Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lateral epicondylitis (LE), also known as tennis elbow, is an overuse tendinopathy originating from the forearm extensor tendons of the elbow. An emerging therapy for the treatment of LE is the use of transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) patches for pain relief and improved function. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the current literature on the effect of a transdermal NTG patch for the treatment of LE. A literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SportDiscus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted. Studies selected for inclusion were those in which patients were clinically diagnosed with LE, RCTs, observational studies, and only articles published in English. Studies were excluded if they involved patients <18 years of age or involved patients with a potential alternative source of elbow pain such as previous surgery to the elbow, a previous history of dislocation, fracture of the elbow or tendon rupture, or a referred pain source such as cervical radiculopathy or peripheral nerve involvement. Studies were also excluded if they involved patients who were already prescribed topical NTG for any other indication (i.e., angina), and if the studies had no measurement of symptom relief or measurement or functional scoring. The initial search strategy yielded 69 articles, out of which four met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. The studies showed improvement in elbow pain in the short-term and mid-term (up to six months), while one study that followed participants for a five-year duration post-treatment, showed no benefit. Three studies used an effective NTG dose of 1.25mg/24h and one study used an effective dose of 1.44mg/24h. Topical NTG was more effective when combined with a tendon rehabilitation program. The most commonly reported side effects of topical NTG were headaches and dermatitis. Overall, the current literature demonstrates that the use of NTG patches for LE improves short- and mid-term pain as well as elbow function. However, more studies are required to fully understand the effect of topical NTG on LE, particularly the effective dose range and the long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.