ArticleCureus2022
Current Requirements and Attitudes Toward Research: A Survey-Based Analysis of Orthopedic Surgery Programs.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Tracks in Orthopedic Surgery: Analyzing Participation, Outcomes, and Academic Contribution.Cureus · 2026Article
- Early Engagement, Lasting Impact: Predictors of Scholarly Activity in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Medical School Ranking and Other Predictive Factors on the 2020 to 2022 Orthopaedic Surgery Match.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) guidelines require scholarly activity but do not specify what research-related activity is necessary to meet this requirement. The current components and opinions regarding research and its implementation that qualify as scholarly activity are unknown among US orthopedic surgery programs. We aimed to survey program directors of orthopedic surgery programs to evaluate and better understand the current state of research during training. Design A survey was sent to the program directors of all ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery between 2019 and 2020 with questions evaluating each program's research requirements and barriers to improvement. Results One-hundred eighteen (N=118) surveys were collected from 94 academic (79.6%) and 24 community (21.4%) programs. Although nearly all (97.5%) programs required research for graduation, only 45% of them allotted protected time: 52 academic programs (55.3%) allotted a median of nine weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 8-12 weeks) of dedicated time and 13 community programs (54.2%) allotted six weeks (IQR: 4-28 weeks) (p=0.595). We distinguished dedicated research as either consecutive weeks or a formal research track for a year. All programs indicated a desire for an increased focus on basic science compared to the current focus on outcomes-based research (p=0.04). The greatest identified obstacle to research improvement reported by community programs was faculty and resource commitment (p=0.003). The overall level of satisfaction with the current research experience among directors is 50.8%. Conclusion Despite differences between academic and community programs, directors agree on shifting the focus of research toward basic science. To improve preclinical research, additional time may be required, and individualized improvement plans should be undertaken at academic and community programs alike.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.