Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653820›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Inequities in access to directly-funded home care in Canada: a privilege only afforded to some.

Christine Kelly, Lisette Dansereau, Maggie FitzGerald, Yeonjung Lee, Allison Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  5. Tackling financial toxicity related to cancer care in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine KellyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. christine.kelly@umanitoba.ca.
Lisette DansereauDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Maggie FitzGeraldDepartment of Political Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Yeonjung LeeSocial Welfare, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Allison WilliamsSchool of Earth, Environment & Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT-169001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirectly-funded home care (DF) provides government funds to people who need assistance with the activities of daily living, allowing them to arrange their own services. As programs expand globally, many allow DF clients to hire home care agencies to organize their services rather than finding their own workers. In Canada, half of the DF home care programs allow users to purchase agency services. The goal of this research is to describe the role of agency providers in DF home care in Canada and consider potential equity implications for service access from the perspectives of clients and families.

methodsFramed with intersectionality, the study included online focus groups with families and clients (n = 56) in the two Canadian provinces of Alberta and Manitoba between June 2021-April 2022. All transcripts underwent qualitative thematic analysis using open and axial coding techniques. Each transcript was analyzed by two of three possible independent coders using Dedoose qualitative analysis software.

resultsThe article presents five thematic findings. First, the focus groups document high rates of satisfaction with the care regardless of whether the client uses agency providers. Second, agency providers mediate some of the administrative barriers and emotional strain of using DF home care, and this is especially important for family caregivers who are working or have additional care responsibilities. Third, there are out-of-pocket expenses reported by most participants, with agency clients describing administrative fees despite lower pay for the frontline care workers. Fourth, agencies are not generally effective for linguistic and/or cultural matching between workers and families. Finally, we find that DF care programs cannot compensate for a limited informal support network.

conclusionsClients and families often intentionally choose DF home care after negative experiences with other public service options, yet the results suggest that in some Canadian contexts, DF home care is a privilege only afforded to some. Given the growing inequalities that exist in Canadian society, all public home care options must be open to all who need it, irrespective of ability to pay, degree of social support, or competence in the English language.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingHome Care ServicesAlbertaCanadaCaregiversHumansManitobaCanadaConsumer directed careDirectly-funded home careDirect paymentsInequity

Identifiers

PMID36653820
PMCPMC9847438
OpenAlexW4317234147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.