Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653800›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Assessing the use of constructs from the consolidated framework for implementation research in U.S. rural cancer screening promotion programs: a systematic search and scoping review.

Jennifer L Moss, Kelsey C Stoltzfus, Madyson L Popalis, William A Calo, Jennifer L Kraschnewski

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L MossPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. jmoss1@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Kelsey C StoltzfusPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Madyson L PopalisPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
William A CaloPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jennifer L KraschnewskiPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Overcoming barriers to cancer screening among women living in rural and segregated communitiesK22CA225705 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MOSS, JENNIFER LINDSAY · 2019 to 2022
$629k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA225705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer screening is suboptimal in rural areas, and interventions are needed to improve uptake. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a widely-used implementation science framework to optimize planning and delivery of evidence-based interventions, which may be particularly useful for screening promotion in rural areas. We examined the discussion of CFIR-defined domains and constructs in programs to improve cancer screening in rural areas.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of research databases (e.g., Medline, CINAHL) to identify studies (published through November 2022) of cancer screening promotion programs delivered in rural areas in the United States. We identified 166 records, and 15 studies were included. Next, two reviewers used a standardized abstraction tool to conduct a critical scoping review of CFIR constructs in rural cancer screening promotion programs.

resultsEach study reported at least some CFIR domains and constructs, but studies varied in how they were reported. Broadly, constructs from the domains of Process, Intervention, and Outer setting were commonly reported, but constructs from the domains of Inner setting and Individuals were less commonly reported. The most common constructs were planning (100% of studies reporting), followed by adaptability, cosmopolitanism, and reflecting and evaluating (86.7% for each). No studies reported tension for change, self-efficacy, or opinion leader.

conclusionsLeveraging CFIR in the planning and delivery of cancer screening promotion programs in rural areas can improve program implementation. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of underutilized CFIR domains, i.e., Inner setting and Individuals, on cancer screening programs.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsHumansImplementation ScienceUnited StatesCancer screeningConsolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)Implementation scienceNon-metropolitanProgram planningRural

Identifiers

PMID36653800
PMCPMC9846667
OpenAlexW4317207852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.