Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653751›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Postnatal care services in rural Zambia: a qualitative exploration of user, provider, and community perspectives on quality of care.

Cephas Sialubanje, Jeanette L Kaiser, Thandiwe Ngoma, Lawrence Mwananyanda, Rachel M Fong, Davidson H Hamer, Nancy A Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cephas SialubanjeSchool of Public Health, Levy Mwanawasa Medical University, Lusaka, Zambia. csialubanje@yahoo.com.
Jeanette L KaiserDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Thandiwe NgomaDepartment of Research, Right to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lawrence MwananyandaDepartment of Research, Right to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Rachel M FongDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Davidson H HamerDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy A ScottDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USRight to Care · ZMLusaka Apex Medical University · ZM

Funding

Partnership for Global Health Research Training Program (Renewal)-Supplement for OBSSR, NCI, NCI-AIDS and NIDCDD43TW010543 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Wafaie W Fawzi, DAVIDSON HOWES HAMER · 2017 to 2026
$12.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010543Fogarty International Center and National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health D43 TW010543.MSD for Mothers MRK 1846-06500.CO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostnatal care (PNC) is an important set of services offered to the mother and her newborn baby immediately after birth for the first six weeks to prevent maternal and neonatal complications and death. This qualitative study explored user and provider perspectives on quality of PNC services in the selected health facilities within the context of the Maternity Homes Access in Zambia project in the Saving Mothers Giving Life districts in rural Zambia.

methodsBetween October 2018 and February 2019, forty focus group discussions (FGDs) (n = 160 participants) and twelve in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted in four districts in Southern and Eastern provinces. FGDs comprised women who delivered within the last year, fathers, community elders, and volunteers. IDIs comprised health workers at facility, district, and provincial levels. Data were analysed using content analysis guided by the international quality of care domains derived from the World Health Organization quality of care framework. Findings were triangulated to understand perceptions.

resultsOverall, study participants perceived PNC services to be beneficial. Nevertheless, respondents had mixed feelings on the quality of PNC services and expressed a stark difference in their perception of factors affecting service quality. Service users described challenges arising from ineffective communication about the new PNC guidelines, and non-adherence of service providers to quality standards regarding respect, preservation of dignity and emotional support. Other factors were long waiting hours, small examination rooms providing inadequate privacy, and low levels of confidentiality. In contrast, service providers attributed poor service quality to various health system-related factors including low staffing levels, dysfunctional referral services, low supply of essential medicines, supplies, vaccines and equipment for optimal routine emergency obstetric and newborn care and management of complications.

conclusionThese findings highlight important intervention opportunities to improve quality of PNC services in Zambia through better communication and raising awareness on PNC guidelines, respect, preservation of dignity and emotional support to mothers. Interventions should also focus on addressing contextual health system challenges including staffing levels, supply chain for essential medicines and commodities, shortening waiting time, and ensuring functional referral system.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornPostnatal CarePregnancyRural PopulationZambiaPostnatal careQualityZambia

Identifiers

PMID36653751
PMCPMC9847069
OpenAlexW4317207899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.