Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653530›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023

Evaluating temporal trends and the impact of surgical subspecialisation on patient outcomes following adhesional small bowel obstruction: a multicentre cohort study.

Lewis Green, Roxane Stienstra, Leo R Brown, Ross C McLean, Michael S J Wilson, Andrew B C Crumley, Paul O Hendry

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lewis Green *Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland.
Roxane Stienstra *Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland.
Leo R BrownDepartment of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland. leorbrown@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6181-7020
Ross C McLeanDepartment of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, England.
Michael S J WilsonDepartment of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland.
Andrew B C CrumleyDepartment of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland.
Paul O HendryDepartment of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland.
Forth Valley Royal Hospital · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSmall bowel obstruction (SBO) is the most common indication for laparotomy in the UK. While general surgeons have become increasingly subspecialised in their elective practice, emergency admissions commonly remain undifferentiated. This study aimed to assess temporal trends in the management of adhesional SBO and explore the influence of subspecialisation on patient outcomes.

methodsData was collected for patients admitted acutely with adhesional SBO across acute NHS trusts in Northern England between 01/01/02 and 31/12/16, including demographics, co-morbidities and procedures performed. Patients were excluded if a potentially non-adhesional cause was identified and were grouped by the responsible consultant's subspecialty. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day inpatient mortality.

resultsOverall, 2818 patients were admitted with adhesional SBO during a 15-year period. There was a consistent female preponderance, but age and comorbidity increased significantly over time (both p < 0.001). In recent years, more patients were managed operatively with a trend away from delayed surgery also evident (2002-2006: 65.7% vs. 2012-2016: 42.7%, p < 0.001). Delayed surgery was associated with an increased mortality risk on multivariable regression analysis (OR: 2.46 (1.46-4.23, p = 0.001)). CT scanning was not associated with management strategy or timing of surgery (p = 0.369). There was an increased propensity for patients to be managed by gastrointestinal (colorectal and upper gastrointestinal) subspecialists over time. Length of stay (p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (p < 0.001) both improved in recent years, with the best outcomes seen in colorectal (2.6%) and vascular subspecialists (2.4%). However, following adjustment for confounding variables, consultant subspecialty was not a predictor of mortality.

conclusionOutcomes for patients presenting with adhesional SBO have improved despite the increasing burden of age and co-morbidity. While gastrointestinal subspecialists are increasingly responsible for their care, mortality is not influenced by consultant subspecialty.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal ObstructionSurgeonsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGeneral surgery [MeSH]Intestinal obstruction [MeSH]Subspecialisation

Identifiers

PMID36653530
OpenAlexW4317373275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.