Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653488›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A hybrid deep learning framework for air quality prediction with spatial autocorrelation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Zixi Zhao, Jinran Wu, Fengjing Cai, Shaotong Zhang, You-Gan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zixi ZhaoCollege of Mathematics and Physics, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, People's Republic of China.
Jinran WuThe Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2388-3614
Fengjing CaiCollege of Mathematics and Physics, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, People's Republic of China. caifj7704@wzu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9518-7159
Shaotong ZhangFrontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System, Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, MOE and College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-2989
You-Gan WangThe Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0901-4671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China implemented a strict lockdown policy to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the worst-affected regions, including Wuhan and Shanghai. This study aims to investigate impact of these lockdowns on air quality index (AQI) using a deep learning framework. In addition to historical pollutant concentrations and meteorological factors, we incorporate social and spatio-temporal influences in the framework. In particular, spatial autocorrelation (SAC), which combines temporal autocorrelation with spatial correlation, is adopted to reflect the influence of neighbouring cities and historical data. Our deep learning analysis obtained the estimates of the lockdown effects as - 25.88 in Wuhan and - 20.47 in Shanghai. The corresponding prediction errors are reduced by about 47% for Wuhan and by 67% for Shanghai, which enables much more reliable AQI forecasts for both cities.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionCOVID-19Deep LearningChinaCitiesCommunicable Disease ControlEnvironmental MonitoringHumansPandemicsParticulate MatterSpatial AnalysisAir PollutantsParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID36653488
PMCPMC9848720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.