Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The performance of protected-area expansions in representing tropical Andean species: past trends and climate change prospects.

Javier Fajardo, Janeth Lessmann, Christian Devenish, Elisa Bonaccorso, Ángel M Felicísimo, Fernando J M Rojas-Runjaic, Haidy Rojas, Miguel Lentino, Jesús Muñoz, Rubén G Mateo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A framework for maximizing the benefit from retaining regrowth on private land.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Present and Future Climatic Suitability ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Javier FajardoReal Jardín Botánico (RJB), CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014, Madrid, Spain. javierfajnolla@gmail.com.
Janeth LessmannUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), 219 Huntingdon Rd, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK.
Christian DevenishNatureMetrics, 1 Occam Court, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7HJ, UK.
Elisa BonaccorsoUniversidad San Francisco de Quito, Instituto Biósfera y Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Quito, Ecuador.
Ángel M FelicísimoCentro Universitario de Mérida, Universidad de Extremadura, Santa Teresa de Jornet 38, 06800, Mérida, Spain.
Fernando J M Rojas-RunjaicMuseu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil.
Haidy RojasLaboratorio de Biología de Organismos, Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, 20632, Caracas, 1020, Venezuela.
Miguel LentinoColección Ornitológica Phelps, Bello Monte Caracas 1060, Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela.
Jesús Muñoz *Real Jardín Botánico (RJB), CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén G Mateo *Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, C/Darwin 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protected area (PA) extent has increased significantly over the last 150 years globally, but it is yet unclear whether progress in expanding coverage has been accompanied by improved performance in ecological representation. Here, we explore temporal trends in the performance of PA networks in representing > 16,000 vertebrate and plant species in tropical Andean countries based on species bioclimatic niche modelling. We use a randomization analysis to assess whether representation gains over time (1937-2015) are the expected consequence of increasing the overall area of the network or the result of better designed networks. We also explore the impact of climate change on protected-area representation based on projected species distributions in 2070. We found that PAs added in the last three to four decades were better at representing species diversity than random additions overall. Threatened species, amphibians and reptiles are the exception. Species representation is projected to decrease across PAs under climate change, although PA expansions over the last decade (2006-2015) better represented species' future bioclimatic niches than did sites selected at random for most evaluated groups. These findings indicate an unbalanced representation across taxa, and raises concern over under-represented groups, including threatened species, and species' representation under climate change scenarios. However, they also suggest that decisions related to locating protected areas have become more strategic in recent decades and illustrate that indicators tracking representativeness of networks are crucial in PA monitoring frameworks.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPopulation GrowthAmphibiansAnimalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeEcosystemEndangered Species

Identifiers

PMID36653418
PMCPMC9849396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.