Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653233›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2023

Smoking Histories by State in the U.S.

Theodore R Holford, Lisa McKay, Jihyoun Jeon, Jamie Tam, Pianpian Cao, Nancy L Fleischer, David T Levy, Rafael Meza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patterns of Birth Cohort‒Specific Smoking Histories in Brazil.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theodore R HolfordDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: theodore.holford@yale.edu.
Lisa McKayDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jihyoun JeonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jamie TamDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Pianpian CaoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Nancy L FleischerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
David T LevyDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Mendez Emilien · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention, Early Detection and Treatment InterventionsU01CA253858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2020 to 2025
$8.4M
Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention and Control PoliciesU01CA199284 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2015 to 2019
$8.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199284NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253858NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmoking rates across U.S. states have declined at different rates over time because some states have progressive tobacco control policies, whereas others have yet to adopt them. Therefore, each state has its own unique historical experience of smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence. This study characterizes smoking histories for each U.S. state by birth cohort.

methodsUsing 1965-2018 National Health Interview Survey and 1992-2019 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey data, statistical methods applied an age‒period‒cohort modeling framework to reconstruct population-level smoking histories for each state. Smoking initiation, cessation, and intensity by age, gender, and cohort were estimated for each state. These were used to construct state-specific trends in the prevalence of current, former, and never smoking as well as the mean smoking duration and pack years. Analysis was conducted from 2017 to 2022.

resultsCalifornia and Kentucky, respectively, are exemplar states of more and less aggressive tobacco control. Initiation probabilities were consistently lower in California than in Kentucky, and cessation probabilities were higher. Hence, the smoking prevalence derived from these parameters is higher in Kentucky. The intensity of cigarette smoking was higher in Kentucky than in California, yielding considerably higher estimated pack years when used with the other parameters. Summaries of smoking trends are given for all states.

conclusionsSmoking initiation, cessation, and intensity trends vary substantially across states, resulting in major differences in estimated smoking prevalence, duration, and pack years. Some states show improvements in smoking metrics over time with more recent birth cohorts, but others have shown very little.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingSmoking CessationHumansKentuckyPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco UseUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36653233
PMCPMC11186469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.