Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653163›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2024

Differentiating stages of functional vision loss from glaucoma using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale and cup:disc ratio.

Heiko Philippin, Einoti Naino Matayan, Karin Marianne Knoll, Edith Macha, Sia Mbishi, Andrew Makupa, Cristóvão Daniel Matsinhe, Isac Vasco da Gama, Mário Jorge Monjane, Joyce Awum Ncheda and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Loss to follow-up and increase in cup-to-disc ratio among glaucoma patients in the IRIS Registry.Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Management and outcomes of primary open-angle glaucoma.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Review
  4. Effect of disc-fovea angle on glaucoma detection in fundus images.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 10 countries.

Heiko PhilippinInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Department of Clinical Research, London, UK Heiko.Philippin@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5380-6994
Einoti Naino MatayanEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Karin Marianne KnollEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Edith MachaEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Sia MbishiEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Andrew MakupaEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Cristóvão Daniel MatsinheEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Isac Vasco da GamaEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Mário Jorge MonjaneEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Joyce Awum NchedaEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Francisco Alcides Francisco MulobuanaEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Elisante MunaEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Nelly Fopoussi GuyleneEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Gus GazzardNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1982-5005
Ana Patricia MarquesInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Department of Clinical Research, London, UK.
Peter ShahInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
David MacleodMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
William MakupaEye Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Department of Clinical Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1872-9169
Eye Center · SALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBCameroon Baptist Convention Health Services · CMPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207472/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlaucoma staging is critical for treatment planning but has rarely been tested in severe/end-stage disease. We compared the performance of the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) and cup:disc ratio (CDR) using a functional glaucoma staging system (GSS) as the reference standard.

methodsPost hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial at the Eye Department of Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) with open-angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure (IOP) of >21 mm Hg, were randomised to timolol 0.5% eye drops or selective laser trabeculoplasty. Fundoscopy established vertical and horizontal CDRs and DDLS. Visual acuity and static visual fields were graded (GSS). The study used area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients to compare staging systems. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations determined risk factors of functional severe/end-stage glaucoma.

results382 eyes (201 participants) were evaluated; 195 (51%) had severe or end-stage glaucoma; mean IOP was 26.7 (SD 6.9) mm Hg. DDLS yielded an AROC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.93), vertical cup:disc ratio (vCDR) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.91, p=0.048) for identifying severe/end-stage disease. Correlation coefficients comparing GSS to DDLS and vCDRs were 0.73 and 0.71, respectively. Advanced structural stages, vision impairment, higher IOP and less financial resources were risk factors of functional severe/end-stage glaucoma.

conclusionThis study indicates that both structural staging systems can differentiate severe/end-stage glaucoma from less severe disease, with a moderate advantage of DDLS over CDR. Clinical examination of the optic disc plays an important role in addition to functional assessment when managing severe/end-stage glaucoma.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleOptic Nerve DiseasesAdolescentAdultHumansIntraocular PressureLikelihood FunctionsTanzaniaVision DisordersDiagnostic tests/InvestigationGlaucoma

Identifiers

PMID36653163
PMCPMC10894823
OpenAlexW4317390095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.