ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2023
Evaluation of race/ethnicity-specific survival machine learning models for Hispanic and Black patients with breast cancer.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on Machine Learning Techniques for Survival Analysis in Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of machine learning methods versus traditional Cox regression for survival prediction in cancer using real-world data: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Examining inclusivity: the use of AI and diverse populations in health and social care: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Reducing demographic bias in biomedical machine learning for cancer detection using cfDNA methylation.Genome biology · 2026Article
- MOTLAB: A Weighted Multi-Omics Transfer Learning Approach to Mitigate Breast Cancer Racial Disparities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The role of AI for improved management of breast cancer: Enhanced diagnosis and health disparity mitigation.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2025Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Cancer Care: Enhancing Nursing Practice and Bridging Disparities.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Individualized survival prediction and risk stratification using machine learning for patients with malignant struma ovarii: a population-based study with external validation.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- The clinical and molecular landscape of breast cancer in women of African and South Asian ancestry.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Patient Characteristics Impact Performance of AI Algorithm in Interpreting Negative Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Studies.Radiology · 2024Article
- Health Equity in Clinical Research Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSurvival machine learning (ML) has been suggested as a useful approach for forecasting future events, but a growing concern exists that ML models have the potential to cause racial disparities through the data used to train them. This study aims to develop race/ethnicity-specific survival ML models for Hispanic and black women diagnosed with breast cancer to examine whether race/ethnicity-specific ML models outperform the general models trained with all races/ethnicity data.
methodsWe used the data from the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme registries. We developed the Hispanic-specific and black-specific models and compared them with the general model using the Cox proportional-hazards model, Gradient Boost Tree, survival tree and survival support vector machine.
resultsA total of 322 348 female patients who had breast cancer diagnoses between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017 were identified. The race/ethnicity-specific models for Hispanic and black women consistently outperformed the general model when predicting the outcomes of specific race/ethnicity. DISCUSSION: Accurately predicting the survival outcome of a patient is critical in determining treatment options and providing appropriate cancer care. The high-performing models developed in this study can contribute to providing individualised oncology care and improving the survival outcome of black and Hispanic women.
conclusionPredicting the individualised survival outcome of breast cancer can provide the evidence necessary for determining treatment options and high-quality, patient-centred cancer care delivery for under-represented populations. Also, the race/ethnicity-specific ML models can mitigate representation bias and contribute to addressing health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.