Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653059›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2023

Evaluating pain in survivors of critical illness: the correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and the Brief Pain Inventory.

Christie Docherty, Martin Shaw, Philip Henderson, Tara Quasim, Pamela MacTavish, Helen Devine, Peter O'Brien, Laura Strachan, Phil Lucie, Lucy Hogg and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christie DochertyAcademic Unit of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care, University of Glasgow School of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Glasgow, UK christie.docherty@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-6612
Martin ShawAcademic Unit of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care, University of Glasgow School of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Glasgow, UK.
Philip HendersonAcademic Unit of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care, University of Glasgow School of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Glasgow, UK.
Tara QuasimAcademic Unit of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care, University of Glasgow School of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Glasgow, UK.
Pamela MacTavishIntensive Care Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Helen DevineIntensive Care Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Peter O'BrienIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Kilmarnock, UK.
Laura StrachanIntensive Care Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Phil LucieIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital Wishaw, NHS Lanarkshire, Wishaw, UK.
Lucy HoggIntensive Care Unit, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, UK.
Malcolm SimAcademic Unit of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care, University of Glasgow School of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Glasgow, UK.
Joanne McPeakeUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8206-6801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain is a common and debilitating symptom in survivors of critical illness. The 'Core Outcome Set for Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure' proposes that the pain and discomfort question of the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) could be used to assess pain in this group, however, it was recognised that further research is required to evaluate how this single question compares to other more detailed pain tools. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the pain and discomfort question of the EQ-5D-5L and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) in survivors of critical illness.

methodsThis study retrospectively analysed paired EQ-5D-5L and BPI data extracted from a prospective, multicentre study evaluating the impact of a critical care recovery programme. 172 patients who received a complex recovery intervention and 108 patients who did not receive this intervention were included. Data were available for the intervention cohort at multiple time points, namely, baseline, 3 months and 12 months. While, data were available for the usual care cohort at a single time point (12 months). We assessed the correlation between the pain and discomfort question of the EQ-5D-5L and two separate components of the BPI: severity of pain and pain interference.

resultsCorrelation coefficients comparing the pain and discomfort question of the EQ-5D-5L and the BPI pain severity score ranged between 0.73 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.80) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.86). Correlation coefficients comparing the pain and discomfort question of the EQ-5D-5L and the BPI pain interference score ranged between 0.71 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.79) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.88) across the various time points.

conclusionsThe pain and discomfort question of the EQ-5D-5L correlates moderately well with a more detailed pain tool and may help to streamline assessments in survivorship studies. More in-depth tools may be of use where pain is the primary study outcome or a patient-reported concern.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessQuality of LifeHumansPainProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurvivorsAssisted VentilationCritical CarePatient Outcome Assessment

Identifiers

PMID36653059
PMCPMC9853256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.