Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36653054›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Implementation evaluation of an evidence-based emergency nursing framework (HIRAID): study protocol for a step-wedge randomised control trial.

Kate Curtis, Margaret Fry, Sarah Kourouche, Belinda Kennedy, Julie Considine, Hatem Alkhouri, Mary Lam, Steven M McPhail, Christina Aggar, James Hughes and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kate CurtisSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia kate.curtis@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3746-0348
Margaret FryFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah KouroucheSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6210-6191
Belinda KennedySusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Julie ConsidineSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, & Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-2456
Hatem AlkhouriEmergency Care Institute, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Mary LamHealth and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Steven M McPhailAustralian Centre for Health Service Innovation and School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Christina AggarNorthern New South Wales Local Health Network, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
James HughesEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-2489
M MurphyWestern Sydney Local Health District, Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-8418
Michael DinhDepartment of Emergency, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Ramon ShabanSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor patient assessment results in undetected clinical deterioration. Yet, there is no standardised assessment framework for >29 000 Australian emergency nurses. To reduce clinical variation and increase safety and quality of initial emergency nursing care, the evidence-based emergency nursing framework HIRAID (History, Identify Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication and reassessment) was developed and piloted. This paper presents the rationale and protocol for a multicentre clinical trial of HIRAID. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design, the study incorporates a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of HIRAID at 31 emergency departments (EDs) in New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland. The primary outcomes are incidence of inpatient deterioration related to ED care, time to analgesia, patient satisfaction and medical satisfaction with nursing clinical handover (effectiveness). Strategies that optimise HIRAID uptake (implementation) and implementation fidelity will be determined to assess if HIRAID was implemented as intended at all sites. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics has been approved for NSW sites through Greater Western Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/ETH02164), and for Victoria and Queensland sites through Royal Brisbane & Woman's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/QRBW/80026). The final phase of the study will integrate the findings in a toolkit for national rollout. A dissemination, communications (variety of platforms) and upscaling strategy will be designed and actioned with the organisations that influence state and national level health policy and emergency nurse education, including the Australian Commission for Quality and Safety in Health Care. Scaling up of findings could be achieved by embedding HIRAID into national transition to nursing programmes, 'business as usual' ED training schedules and university curricula. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001456842.

Indexed as

Emergency NursingAustraliaEmergency Service, HospitalEvidence-Based NursingFemaleHumansNew South WalesRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicaccident & emergency medicinechange managementhealth services administration & management

Identifiers

PMID36653054
PMCPMC9853264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.