Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36652596›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Prevalence and Perception of Telehealth Use in the Middle East and North Africa Region: Survey Study.

Khalid Adnan Shamiyah, Simon Whitebridge, Nitya Kumar, Khaled Aljenaee, Stephen L Atkin, Khawla Fuad Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Telerehabilitation in Saudi Arabia.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khalid Adnan ShamiyahRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3392-2621
Simon WhitebridgeRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0450-8800
Nitya KumarRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-3730
Khaled AljenaeeAl-Adan Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-2190
Stephen L AtkinRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5887-7257
Khawla Fuad AliRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-8166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become a safer way to access health care. The telehealth industry has rapidly expanded over the last decade as a modality to provide patient-centered care. However, the prevalence of its use and patient acceptability remains unclear in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

objectiveThe primary aim was to assess the prevalence of telehealth use before and during the pandemic by using social media (Instagram) as an online platform for survey administration across different countries simultaneously. Our secondary aim was to assess the perceptions regarding telehealth among those using it.

methodsAn Instagram account that reaches 130,000 subjects daily was used to administer a questionnaire that assessed the current prevalence of telehealth use and public attitudes and acceptability toward this modality of health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsA total of 1524 respondents participated in the survey (n=1356, 89% female; median age 31 years), of whom 97.6% (n=1487) lived in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Prior to COVID-19, 1350 (88.6%) had no exposure to telehealth. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth use increased by 251% to a total of 611 users (40% of all users). About 89% (571/640) of telehealth users used virtual visits for specialist visits. Of the 642 participants who reported using telehealth, 236 (36.8%) reported their willingness to continue using telehealth, 241 (37.5%) were unsure, and 164 (25.5%) did not wish to continue to use telehealth after the COVID-19 pandemic. An inverse trend, although not statistically significant, was seen between willingness to continue telehealth use and the number of medical comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.03; P=.09). Compared to the respondents who chose only messaging as the modality they used for telehealth, respondents who chose both messaging and phone calls were significantly less likely to recommend telehealth (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.80; P=.009). Overall, there was general satisfaction with telehealth, and respondents reported that telehealth consultations made them feel safer and saved both time and money.

conclusionsTelehealth use increased dramatically after the COVID-19 pandemic, and telehealth was found to be acceptable among some young adult groups on Instagram. However, further innovation is warranted to increase acceptability and willingness to continue telehealth use for the delivery of health care.

Indexed as

acceptabilityCOVID-19impactInstagramperceptionprevalencesafetysocial mediasurveytelehealthtelemedicineusageutilizationviewWhatsApp

Identifiers

PMID36652596
PMCPMC9897307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.