Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36652508›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Epigenetic resetting in the human germ line entails histone modification remodeling.

Wolfram H Gruhn, Walfred W C Tang, Sabine Dietmann, João P Alves-Lopes, Christopher A Penfold, Frederick C K Wong, Navin B Ramakrishna, M Azim Surani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of methylation on genome mutability in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Mechanisms of human germ cell development.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  6. HELQ Maintains Genome Stability of Primordial Germ Cells by Inhibiting LINE-1 Expression.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epigenetic priming in the male germline.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Annelids as models of germ cell and gonad regeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Wolfram H GruhnWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6072-1916
Walfred W C TangWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5803-1681
Sabine DietmannWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6672-8457
João P Alves-LopesWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3042-6988
Christopher A PenfoldWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5823-4705
Frederick C K WongWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0503-4360
Navin B RamakrishnaWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2974-9886
M Azim SuraniWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8640-4318
University of Cambridge · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SEThe Gurdon Institute · GBWashington University in St. Louis · USWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T01346X/1Medical Research Council MR/P009948/1Wellcome Trust 209475/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic resetting in the mammalian germ line entails acute DNA demethylation, which lays the foundation for gametogenesis, totipotency, and embryonic development. We characterize the epigenome of hypomethylated human primordial germ cells (hPGCs) to reveal mechanisms preventing the widespread derepression of genes and transposable elements (TEs). Along with the loss of DNA methylation, we show that hPGCs exhibit a profound reduction of repressive histone modifications resulting in diminished heterochromatic signatures at most genes and TEs and the acquisition of a neutral or paused epigenetic state without transcriptional activation. Efficient maintenance of a heterochromatic state is limited to a subset of genomic loci, such as evolutionarily young TEs and some developmental genes, which require H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, respectively, for efficient transcriptional repression. Accordingly, transcriptional repression in hPGCs presents an exemplary balanced system relying on local maintenance of heterochromatic features and a lack of inductive cues.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationHistone CodeAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsEpigenesis, GeneticGerm CellsHumansMammalsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID36652508
PMCPMC9848478
OpenAlexW4317254689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.