Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36652413›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands.

Eugene Declercq, Anneke Wolterink, Rachel Rowe, Ank de Jonge, Raymond De Vries, Marianne Nieuwenhuijze, Corine Verhoeven, Neel Shah

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eugene DeclercqCommunity Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5411-3033
Anneke WolterinkAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG/ Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rachel RoweNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.ORCID 0000-0003-2994-3240
Ank de JongeAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG/ Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Raymond De VriesCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-3040
Marianne NieuwenhuijzeAcademie Verloskunde Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6120-4152
Corine VerhoevenAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG/ Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0001-0888
Neel ShahDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine cross-national differences in gestational age over time in the U.S. and across three wealthy countries in 2020 as well as examine patterns of birth timing by hour of the day in home and spontaneous vaginal hospital births in the three countries.

methodsWe did a comparative cohort analysis with data on gestational age and the timing of birth from the United States, England and the Netherlands, comparing hospital and home births. For overall gestational age comparisons, we drew on national birth cohorts from the U.S. (1990, 2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014 & 2020) and England (2020). Birth timing data was drawn from national data from the U.S. (2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014) and from a large representative sample from England (2008-10). We compared timing of births by hour of the day in hospital and home births in all three countries.

resultsThe U.S. overall mean gestational age distribution, based on last menstrual period, decreased by more than half a week between 1990 (39.1 weeks) and 2020 (38.5 weeks). The 2020 U.S. gestational age distribution (76% births prior to 40 weeks) was distinct from England (60%) and the Netherlands (56%). The gestational age distribution and timing of home births was comparable in the three countries. Home births peaked in early morning between 2:00 am and 5:00 am. In England and the Netherlands, hospital spontaneous vaginal births showed a generally similar timing pattern to home births. In the U.S., the pattern was reversed with a prolonged peak of spontaneous vaginal hospital births between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.

conclusionsThe findings suggest organizational priorities can potentially disturb natural patterns of gestation and birth timing with a potential to improve U.S. perinatal outcomes with organizational models that more closely resemble those of England and the Netherlands.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeParturitionCohort StudiesCross-Cultural ComparisonEnglandFemaleHumansInfantNetherlandsPregnancyTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36652413
PMCPMC9847908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.