ReviewAnnual review of psychology2023
Rethinking Vision and Action.
Review in Annual review of psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing drift-diffusion modeling and finger tracking as a window into decision-making in handball penalty situations.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Human-Inspired Dexterity-Oriented Perception and Trajectory Optimization for Robotic Surface Inspection.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Attention- and action-related oscillatory dynamics in a visuomotor network.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Emergent motor timing enhances time perception.iScience · 2025Article
- Characterizing individual differences in selection history bias manifested in goal-directed reaching movements.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- The gated cascade diffusion model: An integrated theory of decision making, motor preparation, and motor execution.Psychological review · 2024Article
- Consciousness and sleep.Neuron · 2024Review
- Influence of age and cognitive demand on motor decision making under uncertainty: a study on goal directed reaching movements.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Continuous action with a neurobiologically inspired computational approach reveals the dynamics of selection history.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Reciprocal facilitation between mental and visuomotor rotations.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Action is an important arbitrator as to whether an individual or a species will survive. Yet, action has not been well integrated into the study of psychology. Action or motor behavior is a field apart. This is traditional science with its need for specialization. The sequence in a typical laboratory experiment of see → decide → act provides the rationale for broad disciplinary categorizations. With renewed interest in action itself, surprising and exciting anomalous findings at odds with this simplified caricature have emerged. They reveal a much more intimate coupling of vision and action, which we describe. In turn, this prompts us to identify and dwell on three pertinent theories deserving of greater notice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.