Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36652291›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review.

Feby Savira, Adyya Gupta, Cecily Gilbert, Catherine E Huggins, Colette Browning, Wendy Chapman, Terry Haines, Anna Peeters

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying Public Healthcare Priorities in Virtual Care for Older Adults: A Participatory Research Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Feby SaviraDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-812X
Adyya GuptaGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3900-9849
Cecily GilbertCentre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3538-8976
Catherine E HugginsGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-7756
Colette BrowningHealth Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-0152
Wendy ChapmanCentre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8702-4483
Terry HainesNational Centre for Healthy Ageing, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-6154
Anna PeetersInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-9132
Deakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUFederation University · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been a rapid shift toward the adoption of virtual health care services in Australia. It is unknown how widely virtual care has been implemented or evaluated for the care of older adults in Australia.

objectiveWe aimed to review the literature evaluating virtual care initiatives for older adults across a wide range of health conditions and modalities and identify key challenges and opportunities for wider adoption at both patient and system levels in Australia.

methodsA scoping review of the literature was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, and gray literature (January 1, 2011, to March 8, 2021) to identify virtual care initiatives for older Australians (aged ≥65 years). The results were reported according to the World Health Organization's digital health evaluation framework.

resultsAmong the 6296 documents in the search results, we identified 94 that reported 80 unique virtual care initiatives. Most (69/80, 89%) were at the pilot stage and targeted community-dwelling older adults (64/79, 81%) with chronic diseases (52/80, 65%). The modes of delivery included videoconference, telephone, apps, device or monitoring systems, and web-based technologies. Most initiatives showed either similar or better health and behavioral outcomes compared with in-person care. The key barriers for wider adoption were physical, cognitive, or sensory impairment in older adults and staffing issues, legislative issues, and a lack of motivation among providers.

conclusionsVirtual care is a viable model of care to address a wide range of health conditions among older adults in Australia. More embedded and integrative evaluations are needed to ensure that virtually enabled care can be used more widely by older Australians and health care providers.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedTelemedicineAgedAustraliaHumansAustraliamobile phoneolder adultsvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID36652291
PMCPMC9892987
OpenAlexW4297405118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.