ArticleObesity surgery2023
Quality and Popularity Trends of Weight Loss Procedure Videos on TikTok.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social media use among patients before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a systematic review.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Quality and guideline concordance of neonatal jaundice information on short-video platforms: implications for parental education and newborn safety.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Exploring the Quality of TikTok-Based Diabetes Self-Management Education in English and Spanish: A Digital Health Study.The science of diabetes self-management and care · 2026Article
- Quality Assessment of Chinese TikTok as a Source of Information About Esophageal Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of knee osteoarthritis-related information on short video platforms in China: a multi-method cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Reliability and quality assessment of internet videos as guidance for dietary weight loss intervention: a cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality and Reliability of Social Media Videos on Weight-Loss Interventions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Multi-Platform Cross-Sectional Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- When Hashtags Shape Surgical Choices: Social Media Hype and Its Impact on Bariatric Surgery Preferences in Taiwan.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of social media videos on weight-loss surgery and GLP-1 agonists: a content quality and reliability analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Advancing emergency upper extremity care: A pilot study of ChatGPT's potential role in diagnosing and managing hand and wrist trauma.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
- Comparing Weight Loss and Metabolic Outcomes of Virtual Versus In-Person Follow-Up Care in Bariatrics: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 12 and 36 Months Post-ESG.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- What Are TikTok Users Saying About Colorectal Cancer? An Examination of Content, Quality, and Emerging Themes.Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- Evaluation of TikTok videos on acute pancreatitis: content quality and reliability analysis.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Quality of Spine Surgery Information on Social Media: A DISCERN Analysis of TikTok Videos.Neurospine · 2023Article
- "The Reynolds-McElhenney effect?": effect of celebrity endorsement on colonoscopy-related videos on TikTok.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
- Patients' and caregivers' perceptions of bariatric surgery: A France and United States comparative infodemiology study using social media data mining.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of social media as a medical information tool parallels rising obesity rates. TikTok, the popular video-sharing platform, contains nearly 99,000 videos hashtagged "weightloss." Prior studies have analyzed the quality of medical information on TikTok in other areas of medicine. However, the quality of videos regarding weight loss procedures has not yet been determined.
methodsHashtags encompassing three weight loss modalities were searched using TikTok's algorithm. The first 50 videos meeting inclusion criteria for each modality were considered. Two independent reviewers categorized videos and assessed their content quality using DISCERN. Quality scores and popularity were compared between videos sources, modalities, and content categories.
resultsOf 150 videos included, 20.7% were created by physicians versus 79.3% by non-physicians (p < 0.001). The average DISCERN score for physician-created content was significantly higher than that of non-physicians (p < 0.001), despite significantly less popularity (p < 0.002). The 50 most popular videos had significantly lower DISCERN scores than the 50 least popular (p < 0.02). The average DISCERN score for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) videos were significantly higher than videos related to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) (p < 0.001). VSG-related videos were significantly more popular than RYGB- and ESG-related videos (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Finally, educational videos had significantly higher DISCERN scores than weight loss transformation and personal experience videos (p < 0.001).
conclusionVideos on TikTok related to weight loss procedures are poor, and greater popularity trends with lower quality. Assessment of content can encourage viewers to seek better information and allow providers to improve patient information tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.