Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36652158›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2023

Analysis of Socio-demographic, Economic and Individual Reasons for COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in Ecuador: A Nationwide Longitudinal Study.

German Josuet Lapo-Talledo, Jorge Andrés Talledo-Delgado, Diego Portalanza, Santiago Ballaz, Aline Siteneski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

German Josuet Lapo-TalledoSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-7534
Jorge Andrés Talledo-DelgadoSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-5808-3636
Diego PortalanzaDepartment of Physics, Climate Research group, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5275-0741
Santiago BallazMedical School, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-5878-8679
Aline SiteneskiSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador. aline.siteneski@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6692-7253
Universidad Técnica de Manabí · ECUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidad Yachay Tech · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current outbreak of SARS-Cov-2, a virus responsible for COVID-19, has infected millions and caused a soaring death toll worldwide. Vaccination represents a powerful tool in our fight against the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Ecuador is one of the Latin American countries most impacted by COVID-19. Despite free COVID-19 vaccines, Ecuadorians still hesitate to get vaccinated. A multivariate binary logistic regression was used to analyze data from the Ecuadorian National Institute of Statistics and Censuses. This study investigated socio-demographics, economic, and individual reasons associated with a person having "no intention" to receive COVID-19 vaccine across the study period of October 2021 to March 2022. The survey revealed an increase of unvaccinated people having no intention of COVID-19 vaccination from 57.4% (October-December 2021) to 72.9% (January-March 2022). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was dependent on factors like sex, age and ethnicity. Socio-economic characteristics and education level were not found to be statistically significant in lack of vaccine intention, but most vaccination hesitancy was due to distrust in the COVID-19 vaccine. People who believed that the vaccine could be unsafe because of possible side effects represented half of the surveyed participants, a proportion that barely diminished during the progress of the vaccination campaign across October-December 2021 (57.04%) and January-March 2022 (49.59%) periods. People who did not believe that the vaccine was effective enough increased from 11.47 to 18.46%. Misbeliefs about effectiveness and safety of vaccines should be considered in the implementation of public health initiatives of communication, education and intervention to improve vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCensusesEcuadorHumansLongitudinal StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19sociodemographic factorssociological factorssurveys and questionnairesvaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36652158
PMCPMC9845833
OpenAlexW4317207964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.