Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2023
Autologous fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04151017 (Efficacy of Autologous Fibrin Glue Versus Suture for Conjuntival Autografting in Primary Pterygium Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Autologous Fibrin Glue Versus Suture for Conjuntival Autografting in Primary Pterygium Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trials
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Fibrin Glue-Assisted Pretreated Lyophilized Human Amniotic Membrane Technique for Retinal Detachment With Inferior Retinal Break.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of a Semi-Autologous Fibrin Sealant for Surgical Applications.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Use of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane During Pterygium Excision: Health Economic Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe and compare the autologous fibrin glue and traditional sutures for conjunctival graft attachment in patients undergoing primary pterygium excision surgery.
methodA randomized clinical trial included patients who underwent pterygium surgery with conjunctival autologous graft (CAG). Using randomization, a single-trained surgeon performed graft fixation with autologous glue or sutures. The glue was prepared immediately before the surgery, using the patient's blood components. After centrifugation, the plasma was collected and enhanced with calcium gluconate. Postoperative assessments were performed on Days 1, 7, 21, 30 and 180. The study evaluated postoperative edema and pain and complications. The mean surgical time was compared. Recurrence of the pterygium was assessed 6 months postoperatively.
resultsThe study evaluated 61 eyes. Thirty-three eyes underwent pterygium surgery using the glue technique, and 28 underwent the traditional suture technique. Fifty-one patients (83.60%) had successful graft adhered to at the end of follow-up. Ten patients (10/33) lost their graft in the glue group, and only 69.70% maintained graft presence in the fourth week versus 100% of the patients in the suture group (p = 0.001). Pain scores were lower in the glue group, and clinical edema was significantly higher. There was no significant difference in graft retraction or the presence of granuloma, necrosis or postoperative infection.
conclusionAutologous fibrin glue is an affordable option for CAG fixation in particular contexts where commercial fibrin glue is unavailable, and it could offer advantages compared to sutures. A higher graft loss rate was observed and might be related to topical anesthesia, and improvements to the technique are needed. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT04151017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04151017?term=20170467&draw=1&rank=1 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.