Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36651951›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Non-invasive kinetic modelling approaches for quantitative analysis of brain PET studies.

Chris W J van der Weijden, Pascalle Mossel, Anna L Bartels, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Gert Luurtsema, Adriaan A Lammertsma, Antoon T M Willemsen, Erik F J de Vries

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry, and Kinetic Modeling of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. First Experience with [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quantification of [Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Kinetic modeling ofEJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  11. Validating the Utility of Supervised Clustering Algorithm for Precise [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluating image-derived input functions for cerebral [Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Beyond stillness: the importance of tackling patient's motion for reliable parametric imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chris W J van der WeijdenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pascalle MosselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anna L BartelsDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rudi A J O DierckxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gert LuurtsemaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Adriaan A LammertsmaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Antoon T M WillemsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erik F J de VriesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. e.f.j.de.vries@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6915-1590

Funding

Stichting MS Research PTO-95105010the Nederlandse organisatie voor gezondheidsonderzoek en zorginnovatie (ZonMW) PTO-95105010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic modelling with arterial sampling is the gold standard for analysing dynamic PET data of the brain. However, the invasive character of arterial sampling prevents its widespread clinical application. Several methods have been developed to avoid arterial sampling, in particular reference region methods. Unfortunately, for some tracers or diseases, no suitable reference region can be defined. For these cases, other potentially non-invasive approaches have been proposed: (1) a population based input function (PBIF), (2) an image derived input function (IDIF), or (3) simultaneous estimation of the input function (SIME). This systematic review aims to assess the correspondence of these non-invasive methods with the gold standard. Studies comparing non-invasive pharmacokinetic modelling methods with the current gold standard methods using an input function derived from arterial blood samples were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE (until December 2021). Correlation measurements were extracted from the studies. The search yielded 30 studies that correlated outcome parameters (V

Indexed as

ArteriesBrainHumansKineticsPositron-Emission TomographyVeinsArterial input functionImage derived input functionPopulation-based input functionPositron emission tomographySimultaneous estimation of the input function

Identifiers

PMID36651951
PMCPMC10119247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.