ArticleSkeletal radiology2023
Original research: utilization of a convolutional neural network for automated detection of lytic spinal lesions on body CTs.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated detection and classification of osteolytic lesions in panoramic radiographs using CNNs and vision transformers.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Deep learning image segmentation approaches for malignant bone lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop, train, and test a convolutional neural network (CNN) for detection of spinal lytic lesions in chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT scans. MATERIALS AND
methodsCases of malignant spinal lytic lesions in CT scans were identified. Images were manually segmented for the following classes: (i) lesion, (ii) normal bone, (iii) background. If more than one lesion was on a single slice, all lesions were segmented. Images were stored as 128×128 pixel grayscale, with 10% segregated for testing. The training pipeline of the dataset included histogram equalization and data augmentation. A model was trained on Keras/Tensorflow using an 80/20 training/validation split, based on U-Net architecture. Additional testing of the model was performed on 1106 images of healthy controls. Global sensitivity measured detection of any lesion on a single image. Local sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) measured detection of all lesions on an image. Global specificity measured false positive rate in non-pathologic bone.
resultsSix hundred images were obtained for model creation. The training set consisted of 540 images, which was augmented to 20,000. The test set consisted of 60 images. Model training was performed in triplicate. Mean Dice scores were 0.61 for lytic lesion, 0.95 for normal bone, and 0.99 for background. Mean global sensitivity was 90.6%, local sensitivity was 74.0%, local PPV was 78.3%, and global specificity was 63.3%. At least one false positive lesion was noted in 28.8-44.9% of control images.
conclusionA task-trained CNN showed good sensitivity in detecting spinal lytic lesions in axial CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.