Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36651729›Full record

ArticlemSystems2023

Inhibition of Ribosome Assembly and Ribosome Translation Has Distinctly Different Effects on Abundance and Paralogue Composition of Ribosomal Protein mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Md Shamsuzzaman, Nusrat Rahman, Brian Gregory, Ananth Bommakanti, Janice M Zengel, Vincent M Bruno, Lasse Lindahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Proteome Remodelling inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ribosome Structural Changes Dynamically Affect Ribosome Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Md ShamsuzzamanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nusrat RahmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Brian GregoryDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ananth BommakantiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Janice M ZengelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vincent M BrunoInstitute for Genome Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lasse LindahlDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8418-7885
University of Maryland, Baltimore County · USHuman Genome Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many mutations in genes for ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) and assembly factors cause cell stress and altered cell fate, resulting in congenital diseases collectively called ribosomopathies. Even though all such mutations depress the cell's protein synthesis capacity, they generate many different phenotypes, suggesting that the diseases are not due simply to insufficient protein synthesis capacity. To learn more, we investigated how the global transcriptome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to reduced protein synthesis generated in two different ways: abolishing the assembly of new ribosomes and inhibiting ribosomal function. Our results showed that the mechanism by which protein synthesis is obstructed affects the ribosomal protein transcriptome differentially: ribosomal protein mRNA abundance increases during the abolition of ribosome formation but decreases during the inhibition of ribosome function. Interestingly, the ratio between mRNAs from some, but not all, pairs of paralogous ribosomal protein genes encoding slightly different versions of a given r-protein changed differently during the two types of stress, suggesting that expression of specific ribosomal protein paralogous mRNAs may contribute to the stress response. Unexpectedly, the abundance of transcripts for ribosome assembly factors and translation factors remained relatively unaffected by the stresses. On the other hand, the state of the translation apparatus did affect cell physiology: mRNA levels for some other proteins not directly related to the translation apparatus also changed differentially, though not coordinately with the r-protein genes, in response to the stresses.

Indexed as

Ribosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsRibosomesRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeRibosomal ProteinsRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinscell stressnucleolar stressribosomal protein paraloguesribosomal proteinsribosome biogenesistranscriptometranslationtranslation stress

Identifiers

PMID36651729
PMCPMC9948716
OpenAlexW4317213692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.