Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36651696›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2023

Characteristics and risk factors for renal recovery after acute kidney injury in critically ill patients in cohorts of elderly and non-elderly: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Xiujuan Zhao, Chengjian Li, Yunwei Lu, Shu Li, Fuzheng Guo, Haiyan Xue, Zhenzhou Wang, Yulan Jiang, Shaoguang Liu, Mingming Chai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Temporal Recurrent Neural Networks for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Recovery by Time of Discharge.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Author Response.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiujuan ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chengjian LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yunwei LuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shu LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fuzheng GuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haiyan XueDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhenzhou WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yulan JiangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China.
Shaoguang LiuEmergency Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu, China.
Mingming ChaiEmergency Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu, China.
Tonghai DuEmergency and Traumatic Surgery Department, Handan First Hospital, Handan, China.
Fengxue ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CNGansu Provincial Hospital · CNHandan College · CNMinistry of Education · ROUniversity of South China · CNZhengzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors for renal nonrecovery among elderly and nonelderly patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients.

methodsA multicenter retrospective cohort of 583 critically ill patients with AKI was examined. We found the best cutoff value for predicting renal recovery by age was 63 years old through logistic regression. All patients were divided into two cohorts, age <63 and age ≥63-years old; on the basis of renal recovery at 30 days after AKI, the two patient cohorts were further divided into a renal recovery group and a renal nonrecovery group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors affecting renal recovery in the two cohorts.

resultsThe 30-day renal recovery rate of patients aged <63 years was 70.0% (198/283), multivariate analysis showed that the independent risk factors affecting renal nonrecovery in age <63 years old included AKI stage, blood lactate level and hemoglobin level. The 30-day renal recovery rate of patients aged ≥63 years was 28.7% (86/300), multivariate analysis showed that the independent risk factors for renal nonrecovery in age ≥63-years old included diabetes mellitus, surgery with general anesthesia, AKI stage, APACHE II score, eGFR, and hemoglobin level.

conclusionsThe renal nonrecovery after AKI in critically ill patients in patients aged ≥63 years was more strongly affected by multiple risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, surgery with general anesthesia, eGFR, and APACHE II score, in addition to hemoglobin and AKI stage.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsKidneyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAcute kidney injuryagerenal recoveryrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36651696
PMCPMC9858530
OpenAlexW4317359833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.