ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023
A deep learning system for quantitative assessment of microvascular abnormalities in nailfold capillary images.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07768644 (Nailfold Capillaroscopy in PH), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nailfold Capillaroscopy in PH: Are Nailfold Changes Reversible With Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy?
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of the mPGES-1 inhibitor vipoglanstat in systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud's.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Trial
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Rheumatology and Systemic Inflammatory Diseases: From Pattern Recognition to Signal Analysis and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Nailfold capillaroscopy in diabetic retinopathy: microvascular insights, clinical value, and translational challenges - a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Performance in Analyzing Nailfold Videocapillaroscopy Images in Systemic Sclerosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Keypoint-Based Video Stabilization Pipeline for Oral Capillaroscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CAPI-Detect: machine learning in capillaroscopy reveals new variables influencing diagnosis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Deep learning analysis for rheumatologic imaging: current trends, future directions, and the role of human.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025Review
- Abnormality detection in nailfold capillary images using deep learning with EfficientNet and cascade transfer learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI for imaging evaluation in rheumatology: applications of radiomics and computer vision-current status, future prospects and potential challenges.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Review
- Rheumatology in the digital health era: status quo and quo vadis?Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Review
- YOLOv8-Based System for Nail Capillary Detection on a Single-Board Computer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automatic assessment of nailfold capillaroscopy software: a pilot study.Reumatologia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesNailfold capillaroscopy is key to timely diagnosis of SSc, but is often not used in rheumatology clinics because the images are difficult to interpret. We aimed to develop and validate a fully automated image analysis system to fill this gap.
methodsWe mimicked the image interpretation strategies of SSc experts, using deep learning networks to detect each capillary in the distal row of vessels and make morphological measurements. We combined measurements from multiple fingers to give a subject-level probability of SSc.We trained the system using high-resolution images from 111 subjects (group A) and tested on images from subjects not in the training set: 132 imaged at high-resolution (group B); 66 imaged with a low-cost digital microscope (group C). Roughly half of each group had confirmed SSc, and half were healthy controls or had primary RP ('normal'). We also estimated the performance of SSc experts.
resultsWe compared automated SSc probabilities with the known clinical status of patients (SSc versus 'normal'), generating receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). For group B, the area under the ROC (AUC) was 97% (94-99%) [median (90% CI)], with equal sensitivity/specificity 91% (86-95%). For group C, the AUC was 95% (88-99%), with equal sensitivity/specificity 89% (82-95%). SSc expert consensus achieved sensitivity 82% and specificity 73%.
conclusionFully automated analysis using deep learning can achieve diagnostic performance at least as good as SSc experts, and is sufficiently robust to work with low-cost digital microscope images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.