Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36651676›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023

A deep learning system for quantitative assessment of microvascular abnormalities in nailfold capillary images.

Praveen Gurunath Bharathi, Michael Berks, Graham Dinsdale, Andrea Murray, Joanne Manning, Sarah Wilkinson, Maurizio Cutolo, Vanessa Smith, Ariane L Herrick, Chris J Taylor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07768644 (Nailfold Capillaroscopy in PH), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07768644 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Nailfold Capillaroscopy in PH: Are Nailfold Changes Reversible With Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of GlasgowRan2026 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsPulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (WHO Group 1 PH), Pulmonary Hypertension (World Health Organization Group 3), Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary HypertensionArmsStandard of Care therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Praveen Gurunath BharathiCentre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Michael BerksCentre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Graham DinsdaleRheumatology Directorate, Salford Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Andrea MurrayDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9244-2882
Joanne ManningRheumatology Directorate, Salford Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Sarah WilkinsonDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Maurizio CutoloLaboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-0932
Vanessa SmithDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6271-7945
Ariane L HerrickDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-7926
Chris J TaylorCentre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBGhent University Hospital · BEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

Department of Health II-LB-1117-20006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNailfold capillaroscopy is key to timely diagnosis of SSc, but is often not used in rheumatology clinics because the images are difficult to interpret. We aimed to develop and validate a fully automated image analysis system to fill this gap.

methodsWe mimicked the image interpretation strategies of SSc experts, using deep learning networks to detect each capillary in the distal row of vessels and make morphological measurements. We combined measurements from multiple fingers to give a subject-level probability of SSc.We trained the system using high-resolution images from 111 subjects (group A) and tested on images from subjects not in the training set: 132 imaged at high-resolution (group B); 66 imaged with a low-cost digital microscope (group C). Roughly half of each group had confirmed SSc, and half were healthy controls or had primary RP ('normal'). We also estimated the performance of SSc experts.

resultsWe compared automated SSc probabilities with the known clinical status of patients (SSc versus 'normal'), generating receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). For group B, the area under the ROC (AUC) was 97% (94-99%) [median (90% CI)], with equal sensitivity/specificity 91% (86-95%). For group C, the AUC was 95% (88-99%), with equal sensitivity/specificity 89% (82-95%). SSc expert consensus achieved sensitivity 82% and specificity 73%.

conclusionFully automated analysis using deep learning can achieve diagnostic performance at least as good as SSc experts, and is sufficiently robust to work with low-cost digital microscope images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningScleroderma, SystemicCapillariesHumansMicroscopic AngioscopyNailsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificityautomated analysisdeep learningnailfold capillaroscopySSc

Identifiers

PMID36651676
PMCPMC10234192
OpenAlexW4317212866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.