Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36651637›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Enterococcus faecium from chicken feces improves chicken immune response and alleviates Salmonella infections: a pilot study.

Ashraf Khalifa, Hairul Islam Mohamed Ibrahim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. GutiMeta · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MitigatingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of Mink-OriginAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. A NewMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Effects of dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashraf KhalifaBiological Sciences Department, College of Science, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Hairul Islam Mohamed IbrahimBiological Sciences Department, College of Science, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4272-929X
Beni-Suef University · EGPondicherry University · IN

Funding

Deanship of scientific research, King faisal university, saudia arabia GRANT2499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics reduce the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the livestock industry. Chicken feces are reservoirs of beneficial microbiomes. The aim of this study was to isolate putative probiotics from the intestinal contents of broiler chickens. Five fecal samples were collected from two poultry farms in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Of the 11 morphologically distinct isolates from chicken feces (CF) samples, five isolates displayed positive reactions to Gram staining, catalase, and oxidase tests, and reacted negatively to a hemolytic assay. The isolates CF1, CF2, CF3, CF8, and CF11 were selected for further analysis of probiotic characterization, gastric survival capacity, antibiotic susceptibility, and antimicrobial activity against poultry infected with Salmonella enterica. CF2 and CF11 showed the highest hydrophobic values (> 51% hydrophobic nature). CF1, CF2, and CF11 showed potent antimicrobial activities. The active isolate CF2 was identified as Enterococcus faecium by 16s rRNA sequencing and showed a genetic similarity of 99.1%. An in vivo study was conducted using a chicken model. Enterococcus faecium-fed chickens showed an improved body weight and a lower mortality rate (17-34%). Salmonella enterica colony-forming unit (CFU) invasion in the spleen and thymus was significantly reduced in the E. faecium-fed chickens. The fecal S. enterica load was reduced from CFU 6.8 to 3.9/g in oral-administered E. faecium-fed chickens. Enterococcus faecium-fed chickens showed increased levels (P < 0.01) of butyric acid and reduced levels (P < 0.01) of intestinal interleukin 1 beta, C-reactive protein, and interferon gamma levels compared to those in the S. enterica-infected chicken group. In addition, E. faecium showed significant binding to Caco-2 epithelial cells in vitro and inhibited S. enterica colonization, indicating co-aggregation of E. faecium in epithelial cells. These results revealed that an E. faecium formulation could prevent bacterial infection and improve the quality of broiler chickens.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsEnterococcus faeciumPoultry DiseasesProbioticsSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCaco-2 CellsChickensFecesHumansImmunityPilot ProjectsPoultryRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SchickenEnterococcusimmune responseinfectionprobioticsSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID36651637
PMCPMC10011332
OpenAlexW4317211346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.