ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
NVTrans-UNet: Neighborhood vision transformer based U-Net for multi-modal cardiac MR image segmentation.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Image Segmentation Under Respiratory Motion Artifacts Using Different Modified U-Net Models.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- AI Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- CAT-Seg: cascaded medical assistive tool integrating residual attention mechanisms and Squeeze-Net for 3D MRI biventricular segmentation.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- NVTrans-UNet: Neighborhood vision transformer based U-Net for multi-modal cardiac MR image segmentation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence and image processing technology, medical imaging technology has turned into a critical tool for clinical diagnosis and disease treatment. The extraction and segmentation of the regions of interest in cardiac images are crucial to the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. Due to the erratically diastolic and systolic cardiac, the boundaries of Magnetic Resonance (MR) images are quite fuzzy. Moreover, it is hard to provide complete information using a single modality due to the complex structure of the cardiac image. Furthermore, conventional CNN-based segmentation methods are weak in feature extraction. To overcome these challenges, we propose a multi-modal method for cardiac image segmentation, called NVTrans-UNet. Firstly, we employ the Neighborhood Vision Transformer (NVT) module, which takes advantage of Neighborhood Attention (NA) and inductive biases. It can better extract the local information of the cardiac image as well as reduce the computational cost. Secondly, we introduce a Multi-modal Gated Fusion (MGF) network, which can automatically adjust the contributions of different modal feature maps and make full use of multi-modal information. Thirdly, the bottleneck layer with Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) is proposed to expand the feature receptive field. Finally, the mixed loss is added to the cardiac image to focus the fuzzy boundary and realize accurate segmentation. We evaluated our model on MyoPS 2020 dataset. The Dice score of myocardial infarction (MI) was 0.642 ± 0.171, and the Dice score of myocardial infarction + edema (MI + ME) was 0.574 ± 0.110. Compared with the baseline, the MI increases by 11.2%, and the MI + ME increases by 12.5%. The results show the effectiveness of the proposed NVTrans-UNet in the segmentation of MI and ME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.