Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650882›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal

African swine fever detection and transmission estimates using homogeneous versus heterogeneous model formulation in stochastic simulations within pig premises.

Amos Ssematimba, Sasidhar Malladi, Peter J Bonney, Kaitlyn M St Charles, Timothy C Boyer, Timothy Goldsmith, Carol J Cardona, Cesar A Corzo, Marie R Culhane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amos SsematimbaSecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Sasidhar MalladiSecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Peter J BonneySecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Kaitlyn M St CharlesSecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Timothy C BoyerU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Science Technology and Analysis Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Timothy GoldsmithSecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Carol J CardonaSecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Cesar A CorzoSecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Marie R CulhaneSecure Food Systems Team, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: African swine fever (ASF) is one of the most important foreign animal diseases to the U.S. swine industry. Stakeholders in the swine production sector are on high alert as they witness the devastation of ongoing outbreaks in some of its most important trade partner countries. Efforts to improve preparedness for ASF outbreak management are proceeding in earnest and mathematical modeling is an integral part of these efforts. Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact on within-herd transmission dynamics of ASF when the models used to simulate transmission assume there is homogeneous mixing of animals within a barn. Methods: Barn-level heterogeneity was explicitly captured using a stochastic, individual pig-based, heterogeneous transmission model that considers three types of infection transmission, (1) within-pen via nose-to-nose contact; (2) between-pen via nose-to-nose contact with pigs in adjacent pens; and (3) both between- Results: Results showed that the predicted mean number of infectious pigs at specific time points differed greatly between the homogeneous and heterogeneous models for scenarios with low levels of between-pen contacts via distance-independent pathways and the differences between the two model predictions were more pronounced for the slow contact rate scenario. The heterogeneous transmission model results also showed that it may take significantly longer to detect ASF, particularly in large barns when transmission predominantly occurs via nose-to-nose contact between pigs in adjacent pens. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the need for completing preliminary explorations when working with homogeneous mixing models to ascertain their suitability to predict disease outcomes.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusSwine DiseasesAnimalsDisease OutbreaksSwineAfrican swine feverGillespie algorithmHeterogeneityHomogeneous mixingTransmission models

Identifiers

PMID36650882
PMCPMC9805783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.