ArticlePeerJ2023
Modulation of lower limb muscles and trajectory correction in the bipedal stance during visual perturbation.
Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory reweighting for postural stability in individuals with low vision and blindness: balance adaptation and muscle co-contraction.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Differences in left and right lower limb control strategies in coping with visual tracking tasks during bipedal standing.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to actively track posture using visual targets as indicators is important for improving impairments in whole-body coordination, and accurate visual feedback on tasks is considered effective in promoting sensory-motor integration and behavioral success. In the present study, we examined inter- and intramuscular modulation between the two lower limbs in response to visual perturbation. Sixteen healthy young subjects (age: 21.3 ± 0.7 years) were asked to move their weight back and forth while tracking a visual target displayed on a monitor in front of them for 30 s. Three types of target movements were examined: a sinusoidal wave (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.