Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650732›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Assessment of Hospital Volume in the Surgical Management of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer: A Polish Population-Based Study.

Szymon Piątek, Filip Urbański, Sabina Karczmarz, Artur Prusaczyk, Piotr Sobiczewski, Magdalena Bogdan, Mariusz Gujski, Mariusz Bidziński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The landscape of ovarian cancer surgery in Italy: Data from PNE.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Szymon PiątekDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Filip UrbańskiNational Health Fund, Warsaw, Poland.
Sabina KarczmarzValue Based Care Employers' Union (SPOIWO), Warsaw, Poland.
Artur PrusaczykDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr SobiczewskiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena BogdanDepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Mariusz GujskiFaculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Mariusz BidzińskiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4767-6369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Surgery is a cornerstone in management of ovarian and endometrial cancer. The European Society of Gynecological Oncology introduced quality indicators to improve management of these cancers. The optimal annual number of surgeries per unit was established for high-quality surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS The database of the National Health Fund on surgical management of endometrial and ovarian cancer was analyzed. Patients treated between 2017 and 2020 were included. Departments where patients underwent surgery were divided according to number of surgeries performed per year in endometrial cancer: ≥80, 79-50, 49-20, 19-0; and ovarian cancer: ≥100, 99-50, 49-20, 19-0. Optimal number of surgeries per center was defined as at least 100 and 80 surgeries per year in ovarian and endometrial cancer, respectively. RESULTS Totally, there were 22 325 surgeries in 316 units and 10 381 surgeries in 251 units due to endometrial and ovarian cancer, respectively. Most surgeries in endometrial cancer (n=15 077; 67.5%) and ovarian cancer (n=9642; 92.88%) were performed in departments that did not meet optimal criteria in number of surgeries. Between 2017 and 2019, an increasing trend in number of surgeries per year in endometrial and ovarian cancer was found. In 2020, there was a decrease in the number of surgeries by 7.8% (n=453) and 8.6% (n=234) in endometrial and ovarian cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In Poland, surgical treatment of ovarian and endometrial cancer is decentralized. Most cancer patients underwent surgery in low-volume general gynecologic departments. The COVID-19 pandemic impaired cancer management, leading to a decreased number of surgeries.

Indexed as

COVID-19Endometrial NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHospitalsHumansPandemicsPoland

Identifiers

PMID36650732
PMCPMC9875547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.