Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650486›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Dry needling on latent and active myofascial trigger points versus oral diclofenac in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Yan-Tao Ma, Yu-Lin Dong, Bo Wang, Wen-Pin Xie, Qiang-Min Huang, Yong-Jun Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yan-Tao Ma *Department of Pain Management, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Lin Dong *Department of Treatment, Yang Zhi Affiliated Rehabilition Hospital of Tongji, Shanghai, China.
Bo WangDepartment of Pain Management, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wen-Pin XieDepartment of Pain Management, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiang-Min Huang *Department of Sport Rehabilitation, School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China. huaqia404@aliyun.com.
Yong-Jun Zheng *Department of Pain Management, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zhengyongjun1971@126.com.
Fudan University · CNHuadong Hospital · CNShanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center · CNShanghai University of Sport · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatent and active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in knee-associated muscles may play a key role in pain management among patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dry needling treatment on pain intensity, disability, and range of motion (ROM) in patients with KOA.

methodsThis randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial was carried out for 6 weeks of treatment and 6-month follow-up. A total of 98 patients met the entry criteria and were randomly assigned to the dry needling latent and active myofascial trigger point (MTrPs) with the stretching group or the oral diclofenacwith the stretching group. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and ROM were statistically analyzed before and after treatment and at the 6-month follow-up.

resultsA total of 42 patients in the dry needling group (DNG) and 35 patients in the diclofenac group (DG), respectively, completed the study, and there was no significant difference in the general data between the two groups. After treatments, both the groups showed a good effect in knee pain, function, and ROM, However, the DNG showed a significantly better result than the DG. Especially in the results of the 6-month follow-up, the DNG showed much better results than the DG.

conclusionsDry needling on latent and active MTrPs combined with stretching and oral diclofenac combined with stretching can effectively relieve pain, improve function, and restore knee ROM affected by KOA. However, the effects of dry needling and stretching are better and longer lasting than those of oral diclofenac and stretching for at least 6 months.

trial registrationRegistered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) in 17/11/2017 with the following code: ChiCTR-INR-17013432.

Indexed as

Dry NeedlingMyofascial Pain SyndromesOsteoarthritis, KneeDiclofenacHumansPainTrigger PointsDiclofenacDiclofenacDry needlingKnee osteoarthritisMyofascial trigger pointsStretching

Identifiers

PMID36650486
PMCPMC9847151
OpenAlexW4317358914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.