Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650394›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Using Community Health Advisors to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness in the Black Belt: a Pilot Study.

Soumya J Niranjan, William Opoku-Agyeman, Claudia M Hardy, Tara Bowman, Agasthya Vedre-Kyanam, Kristine Ria Hearld, Mark T Dransfield, Monica L Baskin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soumya J NiranjanDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. soumya14@uab.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-9187
William Opoku-AgyemanSchool of Health and Applied Human Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Claudia M HardyO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Tara BowmanO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Agasthya Vedre-KyanamUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Kristine Ria HearldDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Mark T DransfieldDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Monica L BaskinDivision of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Omer Jamy · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTU54CA118948 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI UPENDER MANNE, Erica Michelle Stringer-Reasor · 2005 to 2026
$26.6M
Project 5 Nano-micro Hybrid Fibrous Materials for Containment Removal and Site RemediationP42ES027723 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LUNGU, CLAUDIU T · 2020 to 2024
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS U54 CA118948NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease stage at the time of diagnosis is the most important determinant of prognosis for lung cancer. Despite demonstrated effectiveness of lung cancer screening (LCS) in reducing lung cancer mortality, early detection continues to elude populations with the highest risk for lung cancer death. Consistent with the national rate, current screening rate in Alabama is dismal at 4.2%. While public awareness of LCS may be a likely cause, there are no studies that have thoroughly evaluated current knowledge of LCS within the Deep South. Therefore, we measured LCS knowledge before and after receiving education delivered by community health advisors (CHAs) among high-risk individuals living in medically underserved communities of Alabama and to determine impact of psychological, demographic, health status, and cognitive factors on rate of lung cancer screening participation. Participants were recruited from one urban county and six rural Black Belt counties (characterized by poverty, rurality, unemployment, low educational attainment, and disproportionate lack of access to health services). One hundred individuals (i) aged between 55 and 80 years; (ii) currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years; and (iii) have at least a total of 30-pack-year smoking history were recruited. Knowledge scores to assess lung cancer knowledge were calculated. Paired t-test was used to assess pre- and post-knowledge score improvement. Screening for lung cancer was modeled as a function of predisposed factors (age, gender, insurance, education, fatalism, smoking status, and history of family lung cancer). Average age was 62.94 (SD = 6.28), mostly female (54%); mostly current smokers (53%). Most participants (80.85%) reported no family history of cancer. Fatalism was low, with a majority of the participants disagreeing that a cancer diagnosis is pre-destined (67.7%) and that there are no treatments for lung cancer (88.66%). Overall, lung cancer knowledge increased significantly from baseline of 4.64 (SD = 2.37) to 7.61 (SD = 2.26). Of the 100 participants, 23 underwent screening due to lack of access to primary care providers and reluctance of PCPs to provide referral to LCS. Sixty-five percent of those who were screened reported no family history of lung cancer. Regression analysis revealed no significant association between risk factors and the decision to get screened by participants. Our study demonstrates that while CHA delivered education initiatives increases lung cancer screening knowledge, there are significant structural barriers that prohibit effective utilization of LCS which needs to be addressed.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPublic HealthSmoking

Identifiers

PMID36650394
PMCPMC11288175
OpenAlexW4317037185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.