Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650320›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular engineering and technology2023

A State-Of-The-Art Review on Coronary Artery Border Segmentation Algorithms for Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Images.

Priyanka Arora, Parminder Singh, Akshay Girdhar, Rajesh Vijayvergiya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka AroraResearch Scholar, IKG Punjab Technical University, Punjab, India. arorapriyanka29@gmail.com.
Parminder SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Akshay GirdharDepartment of Information Technology, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Rajesh VijayvergiyaDepartment of Cardiology, Advanced Cardiac Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Guru Nanak Dev University · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INPunjab Technical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravascular Ultrasound images (IVUS) is a useful guide for medical practitioners to identify the vascular status of coronary arteries in human beings. IVUS is a unique intracoronary imaging modality that is used as an adjunct to angioplasty to view vessel structures using a catheter with high resolutions. Segmentation of IVUS images has always remained a challenging task due to various impediments, for example, similar tissue components, vessel structures, and artifacts imposed during the acquisition process. Many researchers have applied various techniques to develop standard methods of image interpretation, however, the ultimate goal is still elusive to most researchers. This challenge was presented at the MICCAI- Computing and Visualization for (Intra)Vascular Imaging (CVII) workshop in 2011. This paper presents a major review of recently reported work in the field, with a detailed analysis of various segmentation techniques applied in IVUS, and highlights the directions for future research. The findings recommend a reference database with a larger number of samples acquired at varied transducer frequencies with special consideration towards complex lesions, suitable validation metrics, and ground-truth definition as a standard against which to compare new and current algorithms.

Indexed as

Coronary VesselsUltrasonography, InterventionalAlgorithmsHumansUltrasonographyImage segmentationIntravascular ultrasound (IVUS)LumenMedia- adventitia (MA)

Identifiers

PMID36650320
OpenAlexW4317038729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.