Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650304›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2023

Policy Narratives on Palliative Care in Sweden 1974-2018.

Axel Ågren, Barbro Krevers, Elisabet Cedersund, Ann-Charlotte Nedlund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Axel ÅgrenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. axel.agren@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2891-646X
Barbro KreversDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3678-2932
Elisabet CedersundDepartment of Culture and Society (IKOS), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-5895
Ann-Charlotte NedlundDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-4536

Funding

FORTE 2017-01187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Sweden, efforts to govern end-of-life care through policies have been ongoing since the 1970s. The aim of this study is to analyse how policy narratives on palliative care in Sweden have been formulated and have changed over time since the 1970s up to 2018. We have analysed 65 different policy-documents. After having analysed the empirical material, three policy episodes were identified. In Episode 1, focus was on the need for norms, standards and a psychological end-of-life care with the main goal of solving the alleged deficiencies within end-of-life care in hospital settings. Episode 2 was characterised by an emphasis on prioritising end-of-life care and dying at home, and on the fact that the hospice care philosophy should serve as inspiration. In Episode 3, the need for a palliative care philosophy that transcended all palliative care and the importance of systematic follow-ups and indicators was endorsed. Furthermore, human value and freedom of choice were emphasised. In conclusion, the increase of policy-documents produced by the welfare-state illustrate that death and dying have become matters of public concern and responsibility. Furthermore, significant shifts in policy narratives display how notions of good palliative care change, which in turn may affect both the practice and the content of care at the end of life.

Indexed as

Hospice CareTerminal CareHumansPalliative CarePolicySwedenDeath denialHospice care philosophyInstitutionalised death and dyingPalliative carePolicy narratives

Identifiers

PMID36650304
PMCPMC10126030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.