Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650301›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Local Axial Scale-Attention for Universal Lesion Detection.

Chuanyu Liu, Yonghong Hou, Pengyu Zhao, Zihui Guo, Yueyang Li, Haoyuan Zhang, Jia Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chuanyu LiuSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Yonghong HouSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China. houroy@tju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-1676-5505
Pengyu ZhaoSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Zihui GuoSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Yueyang LiDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, No. 261 Taierzhuang S Rd, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Haoyuan ZhangSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Jia ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, No. 261 Taierzhuang S Rd, Tianjin, 300350, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal lesion detection (ULD) in computed tomography (CT) images is an important and challenging prerequisite for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) to find abnormal tissue, such as tumors of lymph nodes, liver tumors, and lymphadenopathy. The key challenge is that lesions have a tiny size and high similarity with non-lesions, which can easily lead to high false positives. Specifically , non-lesions are nearby normal anatomy that include the bowel, vasculature, and mesentery, which decrease the conspicuity of small lesions since they are often hard to differentiate. In this study, we present a novel scale-attention module that enhances feature discrimination between lesion and non-lesion regions by utilizing the domain knowledge of radiologists to reduce false positives effectively. Inspired by the domain knowledge that radiologists tend to divide each CT image into multiple areas, then detect lesions in these smaller areas separately, a local axial scale-attention (LASA) module is proposed to re-weight each pixel in a feature map by aggregating local features from multiple scales adaptively. In addition, to keep the same weight, a combination of axial pixels in the height- and width-axes is designed, attached with position embedding. The model can be used in CNNs easily and flexibly. We test our method on the DeepLesion dataset. The sensitivities at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 false positives (FPs) per image and average sensitivity at [0.5, 1, 2, 4] are calculated to evaluate the accuracy. The sensitivities are 78.30%, 84.96%, 89.86%, 93.14%, 95.36%, and 95.54% at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 FPs per image; the average sensitivity is 86.56%, outperforming the former methods. The proposed method enhances feature discrimination between lesion and non-lesion regions by adding LASA modules. These encouraging results illustrate the potential advantage of exploiting the domain knowledge for lesion detection.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansLipidsN-Acetylneuraminic AcidRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assistedlipid-associated sialic acidLipidsN-Acetylneuraminic AcidAxial pixelsScale-attentionUniversal lesion detection

Identifiers

PMID36650301
PMCPMC10287604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.