Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650141›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Human activities favour prolific life histories in both traded and introduced vertebrates.

Sally E Street, Jorge S Gutiérrez, William L Allen, Isabella Capellini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The magnitude of legal wildlife trade and implications for species survival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Global dynamics of functional composition in CITES-traded reptiles.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sally E StreetDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. sally.e.street@durham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8939-8016
Jorge S GutiérrezDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Zoology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, 06006, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8459-3162
William L AllenDepartment of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-0438
Isabella CapelliniSchool of Biological Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5DL, UK. I.Capellini@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8065-2436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species' life histories determine population demographics and thus the probability that introduced populations establish and spread. Life histories also influence which species are most likely to be introduced, but how such 'introduction biases' arise remains unclear. Here, we investigate how life histories affect the probability of trade and introduction in phylogenetic comparative analyses across three vertebrate classes: mammals, reptiles and amphibians. We find that traded species have relatively high reproductive rates and long reproductive lifespans. Within traded species, introduced species have a more extreme version of this same life history profile. Species in the pet trade also have long reproductive lifespans but lack 'fast' traits, likely reflecting demand for rare species which tend to have slow life histories. We identify multiple species not yet traded or introduced but with life histories indicative of high risk of future trade, introduction and potentially invasion. Our findings suggest that species with high invasion potential are favoured in the wildlife trade and therefore that trade regulation is crucial for preventing future invasions.

Indexed as

ReptilesVertebratesAmphibiansAnimalsHuman ActivitiesHumansIntroduced SpeciesMammalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID36650141
PMCPMC9845321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.